Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06623 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866908817926651904 |
|---|---|
| author | Singh, Himanshu Xu, Ziwei Subramanyam, A. V. Kankanhalli, Mohan |
| author_facet | Singh, Himanshu Xu, Ziwei Subramanyam, A. V. Kankanhalli, Mohan |
| contents | Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful text generators, yet they can produce toxic or harmful content even when given seemingly harmless prompts. This presents a serious safety challenge and can cause real-world harm. Toxicity is often subtle and context-dependent, making it difficult to detect at the token level or through coarse sentence-level signals. Moreover, efforts to mitigate toxicity often face a trade-off between safety and the coherence, or fluency of the generated text. In this work, we present a targeted subspace intervention strategy for identifying and suppressing hidden toxic patterns from underlying model representations, while preserving overall ability to generate safe fluent content. On the RealToxicityPrompts, our method achieves strong mitigation performance compared to existing baselines, with minimal impact on inference complexity. Across multiple LLMs, our approach reduces toxicity of state-of-the-art detoxification systems by 8-20%, while maintaining comparable fluency. Through extensive quantitative and qualitative analyses, we show that our approach achieves effective toxicity reduction without impairing generative performance, consistently outperforming existing baselines. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_06623 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Do Prompts Guarantee Safety? Mitigating Toxicity from LLM Generations through Subspace Intervention Singh, Himanshu Xu, Ziwei Subramanyam, A. V. Kankanhalli, Mohan Computation and Language Cryptography and Security Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful text generators, yet they can produce toxic or harmful content even when given seemingly harmless prompts. This presents a serious safety challenge and can cause real-world harm. Toxicity is often subtle and context-dependent, making it difficult to detect at the token level or through coarse sentence-level signals. Moreover, efforts to mitigate toxicity often face a trade-off between safety and the coherence, or fluency of the generated text. In this work, we present a targeted subspace intervention strategy for identifying and suppressing hidden toxic patterns from underlying model representations, while preserving overall ability to generate safe fluent content. On the RealToxicityPrompts, our method achieves strong mitigation performance compared to existing baselines, with minimal impact on inference complexity. Across multiple LLMs, our approach reduces toxicity of state-of-the-art detoxification systems by 8-20%, while maintaining comparable fluency. Through extensive quantitative and qualitative analyses, we show that our approach achieves effective toxicity reduction without impairing generative performance, consistently outperforming existing baselines. |
| title | Do Prompts Guarantee Safety? Mitigating Toxicity from LLM Generations through Subspace Intervention |
| topic | Computation and Language Cryptography and Security |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06623 |