What is Safety? Corporate Discourse, Power, and the Politics of Generative AI Safety
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866910014468259840 |
|---|---|
| author | De, Ankolika Lima, Gabriel Zou, Yixin |
| author_facet | De, Ankolika Lima, Gabriel Zou, Yixin |
| contents | This work examines how leading generative artificial intelligence companies construct and communicate the concept of "safety" through public-facing documents. Drawing on critical discourse analysis, we analyze a corpus of corporate safety-related statements to explicate how authority, responsibility, and legitimacy are discursively established. These discursive strategies consolidate legitimacy for corporate actors, normalize safety as an experimental and anticipatory practice, and push a perceived participatory agenda toward safe technologies. We argue that uncritical uptake of these discourses risks reproducing corporate priorities and constraining alternative approaches to governance and design. The contribution of this work is twofold: first, to situate safety as a sociotechnical discourse that warrants critical examination; second, to caution human-computer interaction scholars against legitimizing corporate framings, instead foregrounding accountability, equity, and justice. By interrogating safety discourses as artifacts of power, this paper advances a critical agenda for human-computer interaction scholarship on artificial intelligence. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_06981 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | What is Safety? Corporate Discourse, Power, and the Politics of Generative AI Safety De, Ankolika Lima, Gabriel Zou, Yixin Computers and Society Artificial Intelligence Human-Computer Interaction K.4.2; K.4.3; K.5.2; K.1; K.6.1 This work examines how leading generative artificial intelligence companies construct and communicate the concept of "safety" through public-facing documents. Drawing on critical discourse analysis, we analyze a corpus of corporate safety-related statements to explicate how authority, responsibility, and legitimacy are discursively established. These discursive strategies consolidate legitimacy for corporate actors, normalize safety as an experimental and anticipatory practice, and push a perceived participatory agenda toward safe technologies. We argue that uncritical uptake of these discourses risks reproducing corporate priorities and constraining alternative approaches to governance and design. The contribution of this work is twofold: first, to situate safety as a sociotechnical discourse that warrants critical examination; second, to caution human-computer interaction scholars against legitimizing corporate framings, instead foregrounding accountability, equity, and justice. By interrogating safety discourses as artifacts of power, this paper advances a critical agenda for human-computer interaction scholarship on artificial intelligence. |
| title | What is Safety? Corporate Discourse, Power, and the Politics of Generative AI Safety |
| topic | Computers and Society Artificial Intelligence Human-Computer Interaction K.4.2; K.4.3; K.5.2; K.1; K.6.1 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06981 |