Is Flow Matching Just Trajectory Replay for Sequential Data?
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911656243625984 |
|---|---|
| author | Lim, Soon Hoe Lin, Shizheng Mahoney, Michael W. Erichson, N. Benjamin |
| author_facet | Lim, Soon Hoe Lin, Shizheng Mahoney, Michael W. Erichson, N. Benjamin |
| contents | Flow matching (FM) is increasingly used in scientific domains for time series generation and forecasting, where data often arise from underlying dynamical systems. However, it is not well-understood whether it learns transferable dynamical structure or simply performs an effective "trajectory replay". We study this question by deriving the velocity field targeted by the empirical FM objective on sequential data in the limit of perfect function approximation. For the Gaussian conditional paths commonly used in practice, we show that the implied sampler is an ODE whose dynamics constitutes a nonparametric, memory-augmented continuous-time dynamical system. The optimal field admits a closed-form expression as a similarity-weighted mixture of instantaneous velocities induced by observed transitions, making the dataset dependence explicit and interpretable. This characterization positions neural FM models as parametric surrogates of an ideal nonparametric solution and suggests practical approximation schemes for robust ODE-based generation. As a byproduct of our analysis, the resulting closed-form sampler, FreeFM, provides strong probabilistic forecasts on nonlinear dynamical system benchmarks directly from historical transitions, without training. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_08318 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Is Flow Matching Just Trajectory Replay for Sequential Data? Lim, Soon Hoe Lin, Shizheng Mahoney, Michael W. Erichson, N. Benjamin Machine Learning Chaotic Dynamics Flow matching (FM) is increasingly used in scientific domains for time series generation and forecasting, where data often arise from underlying dynamical systems. However, it is not well-understood whether it learns transferable dynamical structure or simply performs an effective "trajectory replay". We study this question by deriving the velocity field targeted by the empirical FM objective on sequential data in the limit of perfect function approximation. For the Gaussian conditional paths commonly used in practice, we show that the implied sampler is an ODE whose dynamics constitutes a nonparametric, memory-augmented continuous-time dynamical system. The optimal field admits a closed-form expression as a similarity-weighted mixture of instantaneous velocities induced by observed transitions, making the dataset dependence explicit and interpretable. This characterization positions neural FM models as parametric surrogates of an ideal nonparametric solution and suggests practical approximation schemes for robust ODE-based generation. As a byproduct of our analysis, the resulting closed-form sampler, FreeFM, provides strong probabilistic forecasts on nonlinear dynamical system benchmarks directly from historical transitions, without training. |
| title | Is Flow Matching Just Trajectory Replay for Sequential Data? |
| topic | Machine Learning Chaotic Dynamics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.08318 |