Copertina

Reviewing the Reviewer: Elevating Peer Review Quality through LLM-Guided Feedback

Fuente: arXiv

Salvato in:

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali:	Purkayastha, Sukannya, Wan, Qile, Lauscher, Anne, Qu, Lizhen, Gurevych, Iryna
Natura:	Preprint
Pubblicazione:	2026
Soggetti:	Computation and Language Computers and Society
Accesso online:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Aggiungi Tag Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!

Documenti analoghi

LazyReview A Dataset for Uncovering Lazy Thinking in NLP Peer Reviews
di: Purkayastha, Sukannya, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Decision-Making with Deliberation: Meta-reviewing as a Document-grounded Dialogue
di: Purkayastha, Sukannya, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Commitment Checklist: Auditing Author Commitments in Peer Review
di: Chen, Chung-Chi, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

The Good, the Bad and the Constructive: Automatically Measuring Peer Review's Utility for Authors
di: Sadallah, Abdelrahman, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Is Peer Review Really in Decline? Analyzing Review Quality across Venues and Time
di: Kuznetsov, Ilia, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Identifying Aspects in Peer Reviews
di: Lu, Sheng, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

PeerQA: A Scientific Question Answering Dataset from Peer Reviews
di: Baumgärtner, Tim, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

The Lou Dataset -- Exploring the Impact of Gender-Fair Language in German Text Classification
di: Waldis, Andreas, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Decoding Multilingual Moral Preferences: Unveiling LLM's Biases Through the Moral Machine Experiment
di: Vida, Karina, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Sensitivity, Performance, Robustness: Deconstructing the Effect of Sociodemographic Prompting
di: Beck, Tilman, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)

STRICTA: Structured Reasoning in Critical Text Assessment for Peer Review and Beyond
di: Dycke, Nils, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?
di: Kuznetsov, Ilia, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Position on LLM-Assisted Peer Review: Addressing Reviewer Gap through Mentoring and Feedback
di: Yun, JungMin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation Framework
di: Dycke, Nils, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Aligned Probing: Relating Toxic Behavior and Model Internals
di: Waldis, Andreas, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Policies Permitting LLM Use for Polishing Peer Reviews Are Currently Not Enforceable
di: Saha, Rounak, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

DeepReviewer 2.0: A Traceable Agentic System for Auditable Scientific Peer Review
di: Weng, Yixuan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Exposía: Teaching and Assessment of Academic Writing Skills for Research Project Proposals and Peer Feedback
di: Zyska, Dennis, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Benchmark on Peer Review Toxic Detection: A Challenging Task with a New Dataset
di: Luo, Man, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Local Contrastive Editing of Gender Stereotypes
di: Lutz, Marlene, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Hidden Prompts in Manuscripts Exploit AI-Assisted Peer Review
di: Lin, Zhicheng
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Robust Pronoun Fidelity with English LLMs: Are they Reasoning, Repeating, or Just Biased?
di: Gautam, Vagrant, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Stop! In the Name of Flaws: Disentangling Personal Names and Sociodemographic Attributes in NLP
di: Gautam, Vagrant, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Common Sense vs. Morality: The Curious Case of Narrative Focus Bias in LLMs
di: Purkayastha, Saugata, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

LLM-Generated or Human-Written? Comparing Review and Non-Review Papers on ArXiv
di: Elazar, Yanai, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

LLM-as-a-Reviewer: Benchmarking Their Ability, Divergence, and Prompt Injection Resistance as Paper Reviewers
di: Li, Lingyao, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Beyond "Not Novel Enough": Enriching Scholarly Critique with LLM-Assisted Feedback
di: Afzal, Osama Mohammed, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

LLM Review: Enhancing Creative Writing via Blind Peer Review Feedback
di: Li, Weiyue, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards
di: Kim, Jaeho, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

SciCoQA: Quality Assurance for Scientific Paper--Code Alignment
di: Baumgärtner, Tim, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM Agents
di: Jin, Yiqiao, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature Review
di: Pang, Rock Yuren, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

A Scoping Review of LLM-as-a-Judge in Healthcare and the MedJUDGE Framework
di: Li, Chenyu, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

LLM Roleplay: Simulating Human-Chatbot Interaction
di: Tamoyan, Hovhannes, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

A Comprehensive Review of Datasets for Clinical Mental Health AI Systems
di: Mandal, Aishik, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Ethical Concern Identification in NLP: A Corpus of ACL Anthology Ethics Statements
di: Karamolegkou, Antonia, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

When Your Reviewer is an LLM: Biases, Divergence, and Prompt Injection Risks in Peer Review
di: Zhu, Changjia, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Learning from Implicit User Feedback, Emotions and Demographic Information in Task-Oriented and Document-Grounded Dialogues
di: Petrak, Dominic, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Computational Studies in Influencer Marketing: A Systematic Literature Review
di: Gui, Haoyang, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers
di: Paul, Uchswas, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)