Implications of AI Involvement for Trust in Expert Advisory Workflows Under Epistemic Dependence
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866914324239351808 |
|---|---|
| author | Kim, Dennis Daneshi, Roya Draper, Bruce Sreedharan, Sarath |
| author_facet | Kim, Dennis Daneshi, Roya Draper, Bruce Sreedharan, Sarath |
| contents | The increasing integration of AI-powered tools into expert workflows, such as medicine, law, and finance, raises a critical question: how does AI involvement influence a user's trust in the human expert, the AI system, and their combination? To investigate this, we conducted a user study (N=77) featuring a simulated course-planning task. We compared various conditions that differed in both the presence of AI and the specific mode of human-AI collaboration. Our results indicate that while the advisor's ability to create a correct schedule is important, the user's perception of expertise and trust is also influenced by how the expert utilized the AI assistant. These findings raise important considerations for the design of human-AI hybrid teams, particularly when the adoption of recommendations depends on the end-user's perception of the recommender's expertise. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_11522 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Implications of AI Involvement for Trust in Expert Advisory Workflows Under Epistemic Dependence Kim, Dennis Daneshi, Roya Draper, Bruce Sreedharan, Sarath Human-Computer Interaction The increasing integration of AI-powered tools into expert workflows, such as medicine, law, and finance, raises a critical question: how does AI involvement influence a user's trust in the human expert, the AI system, and their combination? To investigate this, we conducted a user study (N=77) featuring a simulated course-planning task. We compared various conditions that differed in both the presence of AI and the specific mode of human-AI collaboration. Our results indicate that while the advisor's ability to create a correct schedule is important, the user's perception of expertise and trust is also influenced by how the expert utilized the AI assistant. These findings raise important considerations for the design of human-AI hybrid teams, particularly when the adoption of recommendations depends on the end-user's perception of the recommender's expertise. |
| title | Implications of AI Involvement for Trust in Expert Advisory Workflows Under Epistemic Dependence |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11522 |