Bond failure in peridynamics: Nonequivalence of critical stretch and critical energy density criteria

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seleson, Pablo, Stinga, Pablo Raúl, Vaughan, Mary
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866908829977935872
author Seleson, Pablo
Stinga, Pablo Raúl
Vaughan, Mary
author_facet Seleson, Pablo
Stinga, Pablo Raúl
Vaughan, Mary
contents This paper rigorously analyzes bond failure in the peridynamic theory of solid mechanics, which is a fundamental component of fracture modeling. We compare analytically and numerically two common bond-failure criteria:~{\em critical stretch} and~{\em critical energy density}. In the former, bonds fail when they stretch to a critical value, whereas in the latter, bonds fail when the bond energy density exceeds a threshold. By focusing the analysis on bond-based models, we prove mathematically that the critical stretch criterion and the critical energy density criterion are not equivalent in general and result in different bond-breaking and fracture phenomena. Numerical examples showcase the striking differences between the effect of the two criteria on crack dynamics, including the crack tip evolution, crack propagation, and crack branching.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_12061
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Bond failure in peridynamics: Nonequivalence of critical stretch and critical energy density criteria
Seleson, Pablo
Stinga, Pablo Raúl
Vaughan, Mary
Materials Science
Analysis of PDEs
74A70, 74R10, 74A45, 45K05, 65R20
This paper rigorously analyzes bond failure in the peridynamic theory of solid mechanics, which is a fundamental component of fracture modeling. We compare analytically and numerically two common bond-failure criteria:~{\em critical stretch} and~{\em critical energy density}. In the former, bonds fail when they stretch to a critical value, whereas in the latter, bonds fail when the bond energy density exceeds a threshold. By focusing the analysis on bond-based models, we prove mathematically that the critical stretch criterion and the critical energy density criterion are not equivalent in general and result in different bond-breaking and fracture phenomena. Numerical examples showcase the striking differences between the effect of the two criteria on crack dynamics, including the crack tip evolution, crack propagation, and crack branching.
title Bond failure in peridynamics: Nonequivalence of critical stretch and critical energy density criteria
topic Materials Science
Analysis of PDEs
74A70, 74R10, 74A45, 45K05, 65R20
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.12061