Hilbert's Program and Infinity
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866915794945835008 |
|---|---|
| author | Zach, Richard |
| author_facet | Zach, Richard |
| contents | The primary aim of Hilbert's proof theory was to establish the consistency of classical mathematics using finitary means only. Hilbert's strategy for doing this was to eliminate the infinite (in the form of unbounded quantifiers) from formalized proofs using the so-called epsilon substitution method. The result is a formal proof which does not mention or appeal to infinite objects or "concept-formations." However, as later developments showed, the consistency proof itself lets the infinite back into proof theory, through a back door, so to speak. The paper outlines the epsilon substitution method as an example of how proof-theoretic constructions "eliminate the infinite" from formal proofs, and how they aim to establish conservativity and consistency. The proof also requires an argument that this proof theoretic construction always works. This second argument, however, requires possibly infinitary reasoning at the meta-level, using induction on ordinal notations. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_12131 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Hilbert's Program and Infinity Zach, Richard Logic History and Overview 03A05 (Primary) 00A30, 03F30 (Secondary) The primary aim of Hilbert's proof theory was to establish the consistency of classical mathematics using finitary means only. Hilbert's strategy for doing this was to eliminate the infinite (in the form of unbounded quantifiers) from formalized proofs using the so-called epsilon substitution method. The result is a formal proof which does not mention or appeal to infinite objects or "concept-formations." However, as later developments showed, the consistency proof itself lets the infinite back into proof theory, through a back door, so to speak. The paper outlines the epsilon substitution method as an example of how proof-theoretic constructions "eliminate the infinite" from formal proofs, and how they aim to establish conservativity and consistency. The proof also requires an argument that this proof theoretic construction always works. This second argument, however, requires possibly infinitary reasoning at the meta-level, using induction on ordinal notations. |
| title | Hilbert's Program and Infinity |
| topic | Logic History and Overview 03A05 (Primary) 00A30, 03F30 (Secondary) |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.12131 |