Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Badger, Benjamin L.
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13466
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866918509964951552
author Badger, Benjamin L.
author_facet Badger, Benjamin L.
contents The ability of machine learning models to store input information in hidden layer vector embeddings, analogous to the concept of `memory', is widely employed but not well characterized. We find that language model embeddings typically contain relatively little input information regardless of data and compute scale during training. In contrast, embeddings from autoencoders trained for input regeneration are capable of nearly perfect memory formation. The substitution of memory embeddings for token sequences leads to substantial computational efficiencies, motivating the introduction of a parallelizable encoder-decoder memory model architecture. Upon causal training these models contain information-poor embeddings incapable of arbitrary information access, but by combining causal and information retention objective functions they learn to form and decode information-rich memories. Training can be further streamlined by freezing a high fidelity encoder followed by a curriculum training approach where decoders first learn to process memories and then learn to additionally predict next tokens. We introduce the perspective that next token prediction training alone is poorly suited for accurate memory formation as the objective itself is non-invertible, motivating the use of combined objective functions for models where the entire input is not exposed.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_13466
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Language Model Memory and Memory Models for Language
Badger, Benjamin L.
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
The ability of machine learning models to store input information in hidden layer vector embeddings, analogous to the concept of `memory', is widely employed but not well characterized. We find that language model embeddings typically contain relatively little input information regardless of data and compute scale during training. In contrast, embeddings from autoencoders trained for input regeneration are capable of nearly perfect memory formation. The substitution of memory embeddings for token sequences leads to substantial computational efficiencies, motivating the introduction of a parallelizable encoder-decoder memory model architecture. Upon causal training these models contain information-poor embeddings incapable of arbitrary information access, but by combining causal and information retention objective functions they learn to form and decode information-rich memories. Training can be further streamlined by freezing a high fidelity encoder followed by a curriculum training approach where decoders first learn to process memories and then learn to additionally predict next tokens. We introduce the perspective that next token prediction training alone is poorly suited for accurate memory formation as the objective itself is non-invertible, motivating the use of combined objective functions for models where the entire input is not exposed.
title Language Model Memory and Memory Models for Language
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13466