Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13629 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866908837225693184 |
|---|---|
| author | Rahman, Tarek Hossen, Md Shaharia Mondol, Mark Protik Mukta, Jannatun Noor |
| author_facet | Rahman, Tarek Hossen, Md Shaharia Mondol, Mark Protik Mukta, Jannatun Noor |
| contents | As Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into education, university students preparing for English language tests are frequently shifting between traditional search engines like Google and large language models (LLMs) to assist with problem-solving. This study explores students perceptions of these tools, particularly in terms of usability, efficiency, and how they fit into English test preparation practices. Using a mixed-methods design, we collected survey data from 140 university students across various academic fields and conducted in-depth interviews with 20 participants. Quantitative analyses, including ANOVA and chi-square tests, were applied to assess differences in perceived efficiency, satisfaction, and overall tool preference. The qualitative results reveal that students strategically alternate between GPT and Google based on task requirements. Google is primarily used for accessing reliable, multi-source information and verifying rules, whereas GPT is favored for summarizing content, providing explanations, paraphrasing, and drafting responses for English test tasks. Since neither tool independently satisfies all aspects of English language test preparation, students expressed a clear preference for an integrated approach. In response, this study proposes a prototype chatbot embedded within a search interface, combining GPTs interactive capabilities with Googles credibility to enhance test preparation and reduce cognitive load. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_13629 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Search in Transition: A Study of University Students Perspectives on Using LLMs and Traditional Search Engines in English Test Problem Solving for Higher Study Rahman, Tarek Hossen, Md Shaharia Mondol, Mark Protik Mukta, Jannatun Noor Human-Computer Interaction As Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into education, university students preparing for English language tests are frequently shifting between traditional search engines like Google and large language models (LLMs) to assist with problem-solving. This study explores students perceptions of these tools, particularly in terms of usability, efficiency, and how they fit into English test preparation practices. Using a mixed-methods design, we collected survey data from 140 university students across various academic fields and conducted in-depth interviews with 20 participants. Quantitative analyses, including ANOVA and chi-square tests, were applied to assess differences in perceived efficiency, satisfaction, and overall tool preference. The qualitative results reveal that students strategically alternate between GPT and Google based on task requirements. Google is primarily used for accessing reliable, multi-source information and verifying rules, whereas GPT is favored for summarizing content, providing explanations, paraphrasing, and drafting responses for English test tasks. Since neither tool independently satisfies all aspects of English language test preparation, students expressed a clear preference for an integrated approach. In response, this study proposes a prototype chatbot embedded within a search interface, combining GPTs interactive capabilities with Googles credibility to enhance test preparation and reduce cognitive load. |
| title | Search in Transition: A Study of University Students Perspectives on Using LLMs and Traditional Search Engines in English Test Problem Solving for Higher Study |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13629 |