Crowdsourcing Piedmontese to Test LLMs on Non-Standard Orthography

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Vico, Gianluca, Libovický, Jindřich
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866914332005105664
author Vico, Gianluca
Libovický, Jindřich
author_facet Vico, Gianluca
Libovický, Jindřich
contents We present a crowdsourced dataset for Piedmontese, an endangered Romance language of northwestern Italy. The dataset comprises 145 Italian-Piedmontese parallel sentences derived from Flores+, with translations produced by speakers writing in their natural orthographic style rather than adhering to standardized conventions, along with manual word alignment. We use this resource to benchmark several large language models on tokenization parity, topic classification, and machine translation. Our analysis reveals that Piedmontese incurs a tokenization penalty relative to higher-resource Romance languages, yet LLMs achieve classification performance approaching that of Italian, French, and English. Machine translation results are asymmetric: models translate adequately from Piedmontese into high-resource languages, but generation into Piedmontese remains challenging. The dataset and code are publicly released.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_14675
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Crowdsourcing Piedmontese to Test LLMs on Non-Standard Orthography
Vico, Gianluca
Libovický, Jindřich
Computation and Language
We present a crowdsourced dataset for Piedmontese, an endangered Romance language of northwestern Italy. The dataset comprises 145 Italian-Piedmontese parallel sentences derived from Flores+, with translations produced by speakers writing in their natural orthographic style rather than adhering to standardized conventions, along with manual word alignment. We use this resource to benchmark several large language models on tokenization parity, topic classification, and machine translation. Our analysis reveals that Piedmontese incurs a tokenization penalty relative to higher-resource Romance languages, yet LLMs achieve classification performance approaching that of Italian, French, and English. Machine translation results are asymmetric: models translate adequately from Piedmontese into high-resource languages, but generation into Piedmontese remains challenging. The dataset and code are publicly released.
title Crowdsourcing Piedmontese to Test LLMs on Non-Standard Orthography
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14675