Edge-ends versus topological ends of graphs

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aurichi, Leandro, Júnior, Paulo Magalhães, Pinto, Guilherme Eduardo
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866908854562848768
author Aurichi, Leandro
Júnior, Paulo Magalhães
Pinto, Guilherme Eduardo
author_facet Aurichi, Leandro
Júnior, Paulo Magalhães
Pinto, Guilherme Eduardo
contents Diestel and Kühn proved that the topological ends of an infinite graph are precisely its undominated graph ends, yielding a canonical embedding of the space of topological ends into the space of graph ends. For edge-ends, introduced by Hahn, Laviolette and Širáň, such an embedding does not exist in general. In this note, we characterize the class of infinite graphs for which the topological ends admit a natural injective map into the space of edge-ends that is compatible with the canonical maps between end spaces. Our characterization is purely combinatorial and is expressed in terms of edge-equivalence classes of vertices. Moreover, when such an embedding exists, we identify precisely which edge-ends arise from topological ends, showing that they are exactly the edge-ends containing a non-dominated ray. This establishes a parallel result to the theorem of Diestel and Kühn for edge-end spaces.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_14943
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Edge-ends versus topological ends of graphs
Aurichi, Leandro
Júnior, Paulo Magalhães
Pinto, Guilherme Eduardo
Combinatorics
General Topology
05C63 05C40
Diestel and Kühn proved that the topological ends of an infinite graph are precisely its undominated graph ends, yielding a canonical embedding of the space of topological ends into the space of graph ends. For edge-ends, introduced by Hahn, Laviolette and Širáň, such an embedding does not exist in general. In this note, we characterize the class of infinite graphs for which the topological ends admit a natural injective map into the space of edge-ends that is compatible with the canonical maps between end spaces. Our characterization is purely combinatorial and is expressed in terms of edge-equivalence classes of vertices. Moreover, when such an embedding exists, we identify precisely which edge-ends arise from topological ends, showing that they are exactly the edge-ends containing a non-dominated ray. This establishes a parallel result to the theorem of Diestel and Kühn for edge-end spaces.
title Edge-ends versus topological ends of graphs
topic Combinatorics
General Topology
05C63 05C40
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14943