Knowing Isn't Understanding: Re-grounding Generative Proactivity with Epistemic and Behavioral Insight

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kaur, Kirandeep, Lyu, Xingda, Shah, Chirag
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866914620054175744
author Kaur, Kirandeep
Lyu, Xingda
Shah, Chirag
author_facet Kaur, Kirandeep
Lyu, Xingda
Shah, Chirag
contents Generative AI agents equate understanding with resolving explicit queries, an assumption that confines interaction to what users can articulate. This assumption breaks down when users themselves lack awareness of what is missing, risky, or worth considering. In such conditions, proactivity is not merely an efficiency enhancement, but an epistemic necessity. We refer to this condition as epistemic incompleteness: where progress depends on engaging with unknown unknowns for effective partnership. Existing approaches to proactivity remain narrowly anticipatory, extrapolating from past behavior and presuming that goals are already well defined, thereby failing to support users meaningfully. However, surfacing possibilities beyond a user's current awareness is not inherently beneficial. Unconstrained proactive interventions can misdirect attention, overwhelm users, or introduce harm. Proactive agents, therefore, require behavioral grounding: principled constraints on when, how, and to what extent an agent should intervene. We advance the position that generative proactivity must be grounded both epistemically and behaviorally. Drawing on the philosophy of ignorance and research on proactive behavior, we argue that these theories offer critical guidance for designing agents that can engage responsibly and foster meaningful partnerships.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_15259
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Knowing Isn't Understanding: Re-grounding Generative Proactivity with Epistemic and Behavioral Insight
Kaur, Kirandeep
Lyu, Xingda
Shah, Chirag
Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
I.2.7; J.4; I.2.6; I.7.m; I.2.m; H.3.3
Generative AI agents equate understanding with resolving explicit queries, an assumption that confines interaction to what users can articulate. This assumption breaks down when users themselves lack awareness of what is missing, risky, or worth considering. In such conditions, proactivity is not merely an efficiency enhancement, but an epistemic necessity. We refer to this condition as epistemic incompleteness: where progress depends on engaging with unknown unknowns for effective partnership. Existing approaches to proactivity remain narrowly anticipatory, extrapolating from past behavior and presuming that goals are already well defined, thereby failing to support users meaningfully. However, surfacing possibilities beyond a user's current awareness is not inherently beneficial. Unconstrained proactive interventions can misdirect attention, overwhelm users, or introduce harm. Proactive agents, therefore, require behavioral grounding: principled constraints on when, how, and to what extent an agent should intervene. We advance the position that generative proactivity must be grounded both epistemically and behaviorally. Drawing on the philosophy of ignorance and research on proactive behavior, we argue that these theories offer critical guidance for designing agents that can engage responsibly and foster meaningful partnerships.
title Knowing Isn't Understanding: Re-grounding Generative Proactivity with Epistemic and Behavioral Insight
topic Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
I.2.7; J.4; I.2.6; I.7.m; I.2.m; H.3.3
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15259