What makes an Expert? Comparing Problem-solving Practices in Data Science Notebooks
Fuente:
arXiv
Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Publié: |
2026
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866915801679790080 |
|---|---|
| author | Torre, Manuel Valle Specht, Marcus Oertel, Catharine |
| author_facet | Torre, Manuel Valle Specht, Marcus Oertel, Catharine |
| contents | The development of data science expertise requires tacit, process-oriented skills that are difficult to teach directly. This study addresses the resulting challenge of empirically understanding how the problem-solving processes of experts and novices differ. We apply a multi-level sequence analysis to 440 Jupyter notebooks from a public dataset, mapping low-level coding actions to higher-level problem-solving practices. Our findings reveal that experts do not follow fundamentally different transitions between data science phases than novices (e.g., Data Import, EDA, Model Training, Visualization). Instead, expertise is distinguished by the overall workflow structure from a problem-solving perspective and cell-level, fine-grained action patterns. Novices tend to follow long, linear processes, whereas experts employ shorter, more iterative strategies enacted through efficient, context-specific action sequences. These results provide data science educators with empirical insights for curriculum design and assessment, shifting the focus from final products toward the development of the flexible, iterative thinking that defines expertise-a priority in a field increasingly shaped by AI tools. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_15428 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | What makes an Expert? Comparing Problem-solving Practices in Data Science Notebooks Torre, Manuel Valle Specht, Marcus Oertel, Catharine Computers and Society The development of data science expertise requires tacit, process-oriented skills that are difficult to teach directly. This study addresses the resulting challenge of empirically understanding how the problem-solving processes of experts and novices differ. We apply a multi-level sequence analysis to 440 Jupyter notebooks from a public dataset, mapping low-level coding actions to higher-level problem-solving practices. Our findings reveal that experts do not follow fundamentally different transitions between data science phases than novices (e.g., Data Import, EDA, Model Training, Visualization). Instead, expertise is distinguished by the overall workflow structure from a problem-solving perspective and cell-level, fine-grained action patterns. Novices tend to follow long, linear processes, whereas experts employ shorter, more iterative strategies enacted through efficient, context-specific action sequences. These results provide data science educators with empirical insights for curriculum design and assessment, shifting the focus from final products toward the development of the flexible, iterative thinking that defines expertise-a priority in a field increasingly shaped by AI tools. |
| title | What makes an Expert? Comparing Problem-solving Practices in Data Science Notebooks |
| topic | Computers and Society |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15428 |