From Conflicts to Collisions: A Two-Stage Collision Scenario-Testing Approach for Autonomous Driving Systems

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Siyuan, Zhang, Fuyuan, Qi, Hua, Ma, Lei, Tsuchiya, Tomoyuki, Hayashi, Michio, Okada, Manabu
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866918343579009024
author Chen, Siyuan
Zhang, Fuyuan
Qi, Hua
Ma, Lei
Tsuchiya, Tomoyuki
Hayashi, Michio
Okada, Manabu
author_facet Chen, Siyuan
Zhang, Fuyuan
Qi, Hua
Ma, Lei
Tsuchiya, Tomoyuki
Hayashi, Michio
Okada, Manabu
contents Autonomous driving systems (ADS) are safety-critical and require rigorous testing before public deployment. Simulation-based scenario testing provides a safe and cost-effective alternative to extensive on-road trials, enabling efficient evaluation of ADS under diverse and high-risk conditions. However, existing approaches mainly evaluates the scenarios based on their proximity to collisions and focus on scenarios already close to collision, leaving many other hazardous situations unexplored. To bridge this, we introduce a collision-related concept of conflict as an intermediate search target and propose a two-stage scenario testing framework that first searches for conflicts and then mutates these conflict scenarios to induce actual collisions. Evaluated on Baidu Apollo, our approach reveals up to 12 distinct collision types in a single run, doubling the diversity discovered by state-of-the-art baselines while requiring fewer simulations thanks to conflict-targeted mutations. These results show that using conflicts as intermediate objectives broadens the search horizon and significantly improves the efficiency and effectiveness of ADS safety evaluation.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_15837
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle From Conflicts to Collisions: A Two-Stage Collision Scenario-Testing Approach for Autonomous Driving Systems
Chen, Siyuan
Zhang, Fuyuan
Qi, Hua
Ma, Lei
Tsuchiya, Tomoyuki
Hayashi, Michio
Okada, Manabu
Robotics
Software Engineering
Autonomous driving systems (ADS) are safety-critical and require rigorous testing before public deployment. Simulation-based scenario testing provides a safe and cost-effective alternative to extensive on-road trials, enabling efficient evaluation of ADS under diverse and high-risk conditions. However, existing approaches mainly evaluates the scenarios based on their proximity to collisions and focus on scenarios already close to collision, leaving many other hazardous situations unexplored. To bridge this, we introduce a collision-related concept of conflict as an intermediate search target and propose a two-stage scenario testing framework that first searches for conflicts and then mutates these conflict scenarios to induce actual collisions. Evaluated on Baidu Apollo, our approach reveals up to 12 distinct collision types in a single run, doubling the diversity discovered by state-of-the-art baselines while requiring fewer simulations thanks to conflict-targeted mutations. These results show that using conflicts as intermediate objectives broadens the search horizon and significantly improves the efficiency and effectiveness of ADS safety evaluation.
title From Conflicts to Collisions: A Two-Stage Collision Scenario-Testing Approach for Autonomous Driving Systems
topic Robotics
Software Engineering
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15837