Is Mamba Reliable for Medical Imaging?

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Latibari, Banafsheh Saber, Nazari, Najmeh, Brignac, Daniel, Sayadi, Hossein, Homayoun, Houman, Mahalanobis, Abhijit
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866910026532126720
author Latibari, Banafsheh Saber
Nazari, Najmeh
Brignac, Daniel
Sayadi, Hossein
Homayoun, Houman
Mahalanobis, Abhijit
author_facet Latibari, Banafsheh Saber
Nazari, Najmeh
Brignac, Daniel
Sayadi, Hossein
Homayoun, Houman
Mahalanobis, Abhijit
contents State-space models like Mamba offer linear-time sequence processing and low memory, making them attractive for medical imaging. However, their robustness under realistic software and hardware threat models remains underexplored. This paper evaluates Mamba on multiple MedM-NIST classification benchmarks under input-level attacks, including white-box adversarial perturbations (FGSM/PGD), occlusion-based PatchDrop, and common acquisition corruptions (Gaussian noise and defocus blur) as well as hardware-inspired fault attacks emulated in software via targeted and random bit-flip injections into weights and activations. We profile vulnerabilities and quantify impacts on accuracy indicating that defenses are needed for deployment.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_16723
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Is Mamba Reliable for Medical Imaging?
Latibari, Banafsheh Saber
Nazari, Najmeh
Brignac, Daniel
Sayadi, Hossein
Homayoun, Houman
Mahalanobis, Abhijit
Cryptography and Security
Artificial Intelligence
State-space models like Mamba offer linear-time sequence processing and low memory, making them attractive for medical imaging. However, their robustness under realistic software and hardware threat models remains underexplored. This paper evaluates Mamba on multiple MedM-NIST classification benchmarks under input-level attacks, including white-box adversarial perturbations (FGSM/PGD), occlusion-based PatchDrop, and common acquisition corruptions (Gaussian noise and defocus blur) as well as hardware-inspired fault attacks emulated in software via targeted and random bit-flip injections into weights and activations. We profile vulnerabilities and quantify impacts on accuracy indicating that defenses are needed for deployment.
title Is Mamba Reliable for Medical Imaging?
topic Cryptography and Security
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16723