It does not matter how you define locally checkable labelings

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Cruciani, Antonio, Das, Avinandan, Raevskaya, Alesya, Suomela, Jukka
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866912915679870976
author Cruciani, Antonio
Das, Avinandan
Raevskaya, Alesya
Suomela, Jukka
author_facet Cruciani, Antonio
Das, Avinandan
Raevskaya, Alesya
Suomela, Jukka
contents Locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs) form the foundation of the modern theory of distributed graph algorithms. First introduced in the seminal paper by Naor and Stockmeyer [STOC 1993], these are graph problems that can be described by listing a finite set of valid local neighborhoods. This seemingly simple definition strikes a careful balance between two objectives: they are a family of problems that is broad enough so that it captures numerous problems that are of interest to researchers working in this field, yet restrictive enough so that it is possible to prove strong theorems that hold for all LCL problems. In particular, the distributed complexity landscape of LCL problems is now very well understood. In this work we show that the family of LCL problems is extremely robust to variations. We present a very restricted family of locally checkable problems (essentially, the "node-edge checkable" formalism familiar from round elimination, restricted to regular unlabeled graphs); most importantly, such problems cannot directly refer to e.g. the existence of short cycles. We show that one can translate between the two formalisms (there are local reductions in both directions that only need access to a symmetry-breaking oracle, and hence the overhead is at most an additive $O(\log^* n)$ rounds in the LOCAL model).
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_18188
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle It does not matter how you define locally checkable labelings
Cruciani, Antonio
Das, Avinandan
Raevskaya, Alesya
Suomela, Jukka
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing
Locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs) form the foundation of the modern theory of distributed graph algorithms. First introduced in the seminal paper by Naor and Stockmeyer [STOC 1993], these are graph problems that can be described by listing a finite set of valid local neighborhoods. This seemingly simple definition strikes a careful balance between two objectives: they are a family of problems that is broad enough so that it captures numerous problems that are of interest to researchers working in this field, yet restrictive enough so that it is possible to prove strong theorems that hold for all LCL problems. In particular, the distributed complexity landscape of LCL problems is now very well understood. In this work we show that the family of LCL problems is extremely robust to variations. We present a very restricted family of locally checkable problems (essentially, the "node-edge checkable" formalism familiar from round elimination, restricted to regular unlabeled graphs); most importantly, such problems cannot directly refer to e.g. the existence of short cycles. We show that one can translate between the two formalisms (there are local reductions in both directions that only need access to a symmetry-breaking oracle, and hence the overhead is at most an additive $O(\log^* n)$ rounds in the LOCAL model).
title It does not matter how you define locally checkable labelings
topic Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18188