Feasibility as a moving target: Fluctuating species interactions lead to universal power law in equilibrium abundances

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eskin, Cagatay, Nguyen, Vu, Vural, Dervis Can
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866910029127352320
author Eskin, Cagatay
Nguyen, Vu
Vural, Dervis Can
author_facet Eskin, Cagatay
Nguyen, Vu
Vural, Dervis Can
contents Theoretical ecology has traditionally equated persistence with the stability of a fixed equilibrium point. Here we argue that the primary threat to ecosystem persistence need not be the loss of stability, but instead the escape of the stable equilibrium to a negative orthant. In a realistic setting, fluctuations in interactions do not merely disturb abundances about an equilibrium but can displace the equilibrium point itself. We theoretically and empirically analyze such displacements of the equilibrium point in a complex community. Theoretically, we find that light-tailed fluctuations in species interactions, no matter how small, lead to a heavy-tailed power law $P(y)=1/y^α$ for the equilibrium abundance $y$ of a species. Remarkably, the exponent $α=2$ is a universal value independent of interaction structure, community size, and species. Empirically, our analysis of 34 species reveals a power law signal for most, with a median exponent $α\sim2.56$. Next, we derive a formula for the critical noise, $σ_c$, beyond which the community experiences feasibility loss ``with near certainty''. We find that $σ_c(N)\sim N^{-1}$, implying that larger communities are significantly more fragile to noise induced feasibility loss. Lastly, we define and calculate biologically measurable analytical metrics for both global and species-specific feasibility escape rates, and implement these metrics in dynamic simulations of 98 real world mutualistic and food web networks, to successfully predict their fragility.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_18942
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Feasibility as a moving target: Fluctuating species interactions lead to universal power law in equilibrium abundances
Eskin, Cagatay
Nguyen, Vu
Vural, Dervis Can
Populations and Evolution
Biological Physics
Theoretical ecology has traditionally equated persistence with the stability of a fixed equilibrium point. Here we argue that the primary threat to ecosystem persistence need not be the loss of stability, but instead the escape of the stable equilibrium to a negative orthant. In a realistic setting, fluctuations in interactions do not merely disturb abundances about an equilibrium but can displace the equilibrium point itself. We theoretically and empirically analyze such displacements of the equilibrium point in a complex community. Theoretically, we find that light-tailed fluctuations in species interactions, no matter how small, lead to a heavy-tailed power law $P(y)=1/y^α$ for the equilibrium abundance $y$ of a species. Remarkably, the exponent $α=2$ is a universal value independent of interaction structure, community size, and species. Empirically, our analysis of 34 species reveals a power law signal for most, with a median exponent $α\sim2.56$. Next, we derive a formula for the critical noise, $σ_c$, beyond which the community experiences feasibility loss ``with near certainty''. We find that $σ_c(N)\sim N^{-1}$, implying that larger communities are significantly more fragile to noise induced feasibility loss. Lastly, we define and calculate biologically measurable analytical metrics for both global and species-specific feasibility escape rates, and implement these metrics in dynamic simulations of 98 real world mutualistic and food web networks, to successfully predict their fragility.
title Feasibility as a moving target: Fluctuating species interactions lead to universal power law in equilibrium abundances
topic Populations and Evolution
Biological Physics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18942