LLMs Can Learn to Reason Via Off-Policy RL

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ritter, Daniel, Oertell, Owen, Guo, Bradley, Chang, Jonathan, Brantley, Kianté, Sun, Wen
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866912931376005120
author Ritter, Daniel
Oertell, Owen
Guo, Bradley
Chang, Jonathan
Brantley, Kianté
Sun, Wen
author_facet Ritter, Daniel
Oertell, Owen
Guo, Bradley
Chang, Jonathan
Brantley, Kianté
Sun, Wen
contents Reinforcement learning (RL) approaches for Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently use on-policy algorithms, such as PPO or GRPO. However, policy lag from distributed training architectures and differences between the training and inference policies break this assumption, making the data off-policy by design. To rectify this, prior work has focused on making this off-policy data appear more on-policy, either via importance sampling (IS), or by more closely aligning the training and inference policies by explicitly modifying the inference engine. In this work, we embrace off-policyness and propose a novel off-policy RL algorithm that does not require these modifications: Optimal Advantage-based Policy Optimization with Lagged Inference policy (OAPL). We show that OAPL outperforms GRPO with importance sampling on competition math benchmarks, and can match the performance of a publicly available coding model, DeepCoder, on LiveCodeBench, while using 3x fewer generations during training. We further empirically demonstrate that models trained via OAPL have improved test time scaling under the Pass@k metric. OAPL allows for efficient, effective post-training even with lags of more than 400 gradient steps between the training and inference policies, 100x more off-policy than prior approaches.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_19362
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle LLMs Can Learn to Reason Via Off-Policy RL
Ritter, Daniel
Oertell, Owen
Guo, Bradley
Chang, Jonathan
Brantley, Kianté
Sun, Wen
Machine Learning
Reinforcement learning (RL) approaches for Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently use on-policy algorithms, such as PPO or GRPO. However, policy lag from distributed training architectures and differences between the training and inference policies break this assumption, making the data off-policy by design. To rectify this, prior work has focused on making this off-policy data appear more on-policy, either via importance sampling (IS), or by more closely aligning the training and inference policies by explicitly modifying the inference engine. In this work, we embrace off-policyness and propose a novel off-policy RL algorithm that does not require these modifications: Optimal Advantage-based Policy Optimization with Lagged Inference policy (OAPL). We show that OAPL outperforms GRPO with importance sampling on competition math benchmarks, and can match the performance of a publicly available coding model, DeepCoder, on LiveCodeBench, while using 3x fewer generations during training. We further empirically demonstrate that models trained via OAPL have improved test time scaling under the Pass@k metric. OAPL allows for efficient, effective post-training even with lags of more than 400 gradient steps between the training and inference policies, 100x more off-policy than prior approaches.
title LLMs Can Learn to Reason Via Off-Policy RL
topic Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19362