Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tao, Muzi, Shi, Chufan, Wang, Huijuan, Tong, Shengbang, Ma, Xuezhe
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22734
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910033775689728
author Tao, Muzi
Shi, Chufan
Wang, Huijuan
Tong, Shengbang
Ma, Xuezhe
author_facet Tao, Muzi
Shi, Chufan
Wang, Huijuan
Tong, Shengbang
Ma, Xuezhe
contents In this work, we study idiosyncrasies in the caption models and their downstream impact on text-to-image models. We design a systematic analysis: given either a generated caption or the corresponding image, we train neural networks to predict the originating caption model. Our results show that text classification yields very high accuracy (99.70\%), indicating that captioning models embed distinctive stylistic signatures. In contrast, these signatures largely disappear in the generated images, with classification accuracy dropping to at most 50\% even for the state-of-the-art Flux model. To better understand this cross-modal discrepancy, we further analyze the data and find that the generated images fail to preserve key variations present in captions, such as differences in the level of detail, emphasis on color and texture, and the distribution of objects within a scene. Overall, our classification-based framework provides a novel methodology for quantifying both the stylistic idiosyncrasies of caption models and the prompt-following ability of text-to-image systems.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_22734
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Asymmetric Idiosyncrasies in Multimodal Models
Tao, Muzi
Shi, Chufan
Wang, Huijuan
Tong, Shengbang
Ma, Xuezhe
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
In this work, we study idiosyncrasies in the caption models and their downstream impact on text-to-image models. We design a systematic analysis: given either a generated caption or the corresponding image, we train neural networks to predict the originating caption model. Our results show that text classification yields very high accuracy (99.70\%), indicating that captioning models embed distinctive stylistic signatures. In contrast, these signatures largely disappear in the generated images, with classification accuracy dropping to at most 50\% even for the state-of-the-art Flux model. To better understand this cross-modal discrepancy, we further analyze the data and find that the generated images fail to preserve key variations present in captions, such as differences in the level of detail, emphasis on color and texture, and the distribution of objects within a scene. Overall, our classification-based framework provides a novel methodology for quantifying both the stylistic idiosyncrasies of caption models and the prompt-following ability of text-to-image systems.
title Asymmetric Idiosyncrasies in Multimodal Models
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22734