LLM Novice Uplift on Dual-Use, In Silico Biology Tasks

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Chen Bo Calvin, Knight, Christina Q., Kruus, Nicholas, Hausenloy, Jason, Medeiros, Pedro, Li, Nathaniel, Kim, Aiden, Orlovskiy, Yury, Breen, Coleman, Cai, Bryce, Götting, Jasper, Liu, Andrew Bo, Nedungadi, Samira, Rodriguez, Paula, He, Yannis Yiming, Shaaban, Mohamed, Wang, Zifan, Donoughe, Seth, Michael, Julian
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866914392354848768
author Zhang, Chen Bo Calvin
Knight, Christina Q.
Kruus, Nicholas
Hausenloy, Jason
Medeiros, Pedro
Li, Nathaniel
Kim, Aiden
Orlovskiy, Yury
Breen, Coleman
Cai, Bryce
Götting, Jasper
Liu, Andrew Bo
Nedungadi, Samira
Rodriguez, Paula
He, Yannis Yiming
Shaaban, Mohamed
Wang, Zifan
Donoughe, Seth
Michael, Julian
author_facet Zhang, Chen Bo Calvin
Knight, Christina Q.
Kruus, Nicholas
Hausenloy, Jason
Medeiros, Pedro
Li, Nathaniel
Kim, Aiden
Orlovskiy, Yury
Breen, Coleman
Cai, Bryce
Götting, Jasper
Liu, Andrew Bo
Nedungadi, Samira
Rodriguez, Paula
He, Yannis Yiming
Shaaban, Mohamed
Wang, Zifan
Donoughe, Seth
Michael, Julian
contents Large language models (LLMs) perform increasingly well on biology benchmarks, but it remains unclear whether they uplift novice users -- i.e., enable humans to perform better than with internet-only resources. This uncertainty is central to understanding both scientific acceleration and dual-use risk. We conducted a multi-model, multi-benchmark human uplift study comparing novices with LLM access versus internet-only access across eight biosecurity-relevant task sets. Participants worked on complex problems with ample time (up to 13 hours for the most involved tasks). We found that LLM access provided substantial uplift: novices with LLMs were 4.16 times more accurate than controls (95% CI [2.63, 6.87]). On four benchmarks with available expert baselines (internet-only), novices with LLMs outperformed experts on three of them. Perhaps surprisingly, standalone LLMs often exceeded LLM-assisted novices, indicating that users were not eliciting the strongest available contributions from the LLMs. Most participants (89.6%) reported little difficulty obtaining dual-use-relevant information despite safeguards. Overall, LLMs substantially uplift novices on biological tasks previously reserved for trained practitioners, underscoring the need for sustained, interactive uplift evaluations alongside traditional benchmarks.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_23329
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle LLM Novice Uplift on Dual-Use, In Silico Biology Tasks
Zhang, Chen Bo Calvin
Knight, Christina Q.
Kruus, Nicholas
Hausenloy, Jason
Medeiros, Pedro
Li, Nathaniel
Kim, Aiden
Orlovskiy, Yury
Breen, Coleman
Cai, Bryce
Götting, Jasper
Liu, Andrew Bo
Nedungadi, Samira
Rodriguez, Paula
He, Yannis Yiming
Shaaban, Mohamed
Wang, Zifan
Donoughe, Seth
Michael, Julian
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Cryptography and Security
Computers and Society
Human-Computer Interaction
Large language models (LLMs) perform increasingly well on biology benchmarks, but it remains unclear whether they uplift novice users -- i.e., enable humans to perform better than with internet-only resources. This uncertainty is central to understanding both scientific acceleration and dual-use risk. We conducted a multi-model, multi-benchmark human uplift study comparing novices with LLM access versus internet-only access across eight biosecurity-relevant task sets. Participants worked on complex problems with ample time (up to 13 hours for the most involved tasks). We found that LLM access provided substantial uplift: novices with LLMs were 4.16 times more accurate than controls (95% CI [2.63, 6.87]). On four benchmarks with available expert baselines (internet-only), novices with LLMs outperformed experts on three of them. Perhaps surprisingly, standalone LLMs often exceeded LLM-assisted novices, indicating that users were not eliciting the strongest available contributions from the LLMs. Most participants (89.6%) reported little difficulty obtaining dual-use-relevant information despite safeguards. Overall, LLMs substantially uplift novices on biological tasks previously reserved for trained practitioners, underscoring the need for sustained, interactive uplift evaluations alongside traditional benchmarks.
title LLM Novice Uplift on Dual-Use, In Silico Biology Tasks
topic Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Cryptography and Security
Computers and Society
Human-Computer Interaction
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.23329