Recycling Failures: Salvaging Exploration in RLVR via Fine-Grained Off-Policy Guidance

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ren, Yanwei, Zhang, Haotian, Xiao, Likang, Zhang, Xikai, Huang, Jiaxing, Qiu, Jiayan, Yu, Baosheng, Chen, Quan, Liu, Liu
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866914357929050112
author Ren, Yanwei
Zhang, Haotian
Xiao, Likang
Zhang, Xikai
Huang, Jiaxing
Qiu, Jiayan
Yu, Baosheng
Chen, Quan
Liu, Liu
author_facet Ren, Yanwei
Zhang, Haotian
Xiao, Likang
Zhang, Xikai
Huang, Jiaxing
Qiu, Jiayan
Yu, Baosheng
Chen, Quan
Liu, Liu
contents Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing the complex reasoning capabilities of Large Reasoning Models. However, standard outcome-based supervision suffers from a critical limitation that penalizes trajectories that are largely correct but fail due to several missteps as heavily as completely erroneous ones. This coarse feedback signal causes the model to discard valuable largely correct rollouts, leading to a degradation in rollout diversity that prematurely narrows the exploration space. Process Reward Models have demonstrated efficacy in providing reliable step-wise verification for test-time scaling, naively integrating these signals into RLVR as dense rewards proves ineffective.Prior methods attempt to introduce off-policy guided whole-trajectory replacement that often outside the policy model's distribution, but still fail to utilize the largely correct rollouts generated by the model itself and thus do not effectively mitigate the narrowing of the exploration space. To address these issues, we propose SCOPE (Step-wise Correction for On-Policy Exploration), a novel framework that utilizes Process Reward Models to pinpoint the first erroneous step in suboptimal rollouts and applies fine-grained, step-wise off-policy rectification. By applying precise refinement on partially correct rollout, our method effectively salvages partially correct trajectories and increases diversity score by 13.5%, thereby sustaining a broad exploration space. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach establishes new state-of-the-art results, achieving an average accuracy of 46.6% on math reasoning and exhibiting robust generalization with 53.4% accuracy on out-of-distribution reasoning tasks.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_24110
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Recycling Failures: Salvaging Exploration in RLVR via Fine-Grained Off-Policy Guidance
Ren, Yanwei
Zhang, Haotian
Xiao, Likang
Zhang, Xikai
Huang, Jiaxing
Qiu, Jiayan
Yu, Baosheng
Chen, Quan
Liu, Liu
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing the complex reasoning capabilities of Large Reasoning Models. However, standard outcome-based supervision suffers from a critical limitation that penalizes trajectories that are largely correct but fail due to several missteps as heavily as completely erroneous ones. This coarse feedback signal causes the model to discard valuable largely correct rollouts, leading to a degradation in rollout diversity that prematurely narrows the exploration space. Process Reward Models have demonstrated efficacy in providing reliable step-wise verification for test-time scaling, naively integrating these signals into RLVR as dense rewards proves ineffective.Prior methods attempt to introduce off-policy guided whole-trajectory replacement that often outside the policy model's distribution, but still fail to utilize the largely correct rollouts generated by the model itself and thus do not effectively mitigate the narrowing of the exploration space. To address these issues, we propose SCOPE (Step-wise Correction for On-Policy Exploration), a novel framework that utilizes Process Reward Models to pinpoint the first erroneous step in suboptimal rollouts and applies fine-grained, step-wise off-policy rectification. By applying precise refinement on partially correct rollout, our method effectively salvages partially correct trajectories and increases diversity score by 13.5%, thereby sustaining a broad exploration space. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach establishes new state-of-the-art results, achieving an average accuracy of 46.6% on math reasoning and exhibiting robust generalization with 53.4% accuracy on out-of-distribution reasoning tasks.
title Recycling Failures: Salvaging Exploration in RLVR via Fine-Grained Off-Policy Guidance
topic Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.24110