Cover Image

Top performers and top journals: Persistent concentration in scientific publishing

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Kwiek, Marek, Roszka, Wojciech
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2026
Subjects:	Digital Libraries
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

International Research Collaboration Among Top Performers: A Gender Gap Persists
by: Kwiek, Marek, et al.
Published: (2025)

Top Research Performance Over Three Decades: A Multidimensional Micro-Data Approach
by: Kwiek, Marek, et al.
Published: (2024)

Success in Science: How Global Prestige Organizes Careers
by: Kwiek, Marek, et al.
Published: (2026)

Are Scientists Changing their Research Productivity Classes When They Move Up the Academic Ladder?
by: Kwiek, Marek, et al.
Published: (2024)

What Large-Scale Publication and Citation Data Tell Us About International Research Collaboration in Europe: Changing National Patterns in Global Contexts
by: Kwiek, Marek
Published: (2023)

The European research elite: a cross-national study of highly productive academics in 11 countries
by: Kwiek, Marek
Published: (2025)

Young Male and Female Scientists: A Quantitative Exploratory Study of the Changing Demographics of the Global Scientific Workforce
by: Kwiek, Marek, et al.
Published: (2023)

Men and Women Survivors in Science: A Comprehensive Analysis
by: Kwiek, Marek, et al.
Published: (2025)

Quantifying Lifetime Productivity Changes: A Longitudinal Study of 320,000 Late-Career Scientists
by: Kwiek, Marek, et al.
Published: (2024)

Women in Science: Measuring Participation in Europe Across Disciplines, Generations and Over Time
by: Kwiek, Marek, et al.
Published: (2024)

The strain on scientific publishing
by: Hanson, Mark A., et al.
Published: (2023)

Fake scientific journals are here to stay
by: Orduña-Malea, Enrique
Published: (2025)

APC waivers and Ukraine's publishing output in Gold OA journals: Evidence from five commercial publishers
by: Nazarovets, Serhii
Published: (2025)

Twitter should now be referred to as X: How academics, journals and publishers need to make the nomenclatural transition
by: da Silva, Jaime A. Teixeira, et al.
Published: (2024)

Social media uptake of scientific journals: A comparison between X and WeChat
by: Cong, Ting, et al.
Published: (2025)

Comparison of OpenAlex and Scopus coverage of German institutions' publications in top-tier journals
by: Lovakov, Andrey, et al.
Published: (2026)

Could AI change the scientific publishing market once and for all?
by: Strielkowski, Wadim
Published: (2024)

The oligopoly of academic publishers persists in exclusive database
by: van Bellen, Simon, et al.
Published: (2024)

The existence of stealth corrections in scientific literature -- a threat to scientific integrity
by: Aquarius, Rene, et al.
Published: (2024)

How open are hybrid journals included in transformative agreements?
by: Jahn, Najko
Published: (2024)

Mapping scientific communities at scale
by: Barbier, Victor, et al.
Published: (2025)

Which international co-authorships produce higher quality journal articles?
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2022)

PreprintToPaper dataset: connecting bioRxiv preprints with journal publications
by: Badalova, Fidan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Regional profile of questionable publishing
by: You, Taekho, et al.
Published: (2023)

AI-assisted writing and the reorganization of scientific knowledge
by: Yan, Erjia, et al.
Published: (2026)

Use of LLMs in preparing accessible scientific papers
by: Doami, Allison, et al.
Published: (2025)

Big Deal cancellations and scholarly publishing: Insights from faculty and graduate student interviews
by: Hare, Madelaine, et al.
Published: (2026)

Access models, authorship patterns, and citation impact in Ukrainian scholarly publishing (2020-2023)
by: Hladchenko, Myroslava
Published: (2025)

Education journal rankings: A diversity-based Author Affiliation Index assessment methodology
by: Yang, Yan-Hong, et al.
Published: (2023)

Distinguishing articles in questionable and non-questionable journals using quantitative indicators associated with quality
by: Stephen, Dimity
Published: (2024)

An open dataset of article processing charges from six large scholarly publishers (2019-2023)
by: Butler, Leigh-Ann, et al.
Published: (2024)

Transparency to hybrid open access through publisher-provided metadata: An article-level study of Elsevier
by: Jahn, Najko, et al.
Published: (2021)

Using language models to label clusters of scientific documents
by: Murray, Dakota, et al.
Published: (2025)

A multi-dimensional analysis of usage counts, Mendeley readership, and citations for journal and conference papers
by: Tian, Wencan, et al.
Published: (2024)

The Curious Case of Max Planck retracted papers. When past scientific practices meet contemporary publishing norms
by: Gingras, Yves, et al.
Published: (2026)

Estimating global article processing charges paid to six publishers for open access between 2019 and 2023
by: Haustein, Stefanie, et al.
Published: (2024)

Rxiv-Maker: an automated template engine for streamlined scientific publications
by: Saraiva, Bruno M., et al.
Published: (2025)

In which fields can ChatGPT detect journal article quality? An evaluation of REF2021 results
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

Evaluating the quality of published medical research with ChatGPT
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

Analysis of effects to scientific impact indicators based on the coevolution of coauthorship and citation networks
by: Xue, Haobai
Published: (2024)