Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00368 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866911474555813888 |
|---|---|
| author | Bramantyo, Hutama Arif Faridi, Mukarram Ali Chen, Rui Harris, Clarissa Sun, Yin |
| author_facet | Bramantyo, Hutama Arif Faridi, Mukarram Ali Chen, Rui Harris, Clarissa Sun, Yin |
| contents | In this study, we present a meat freshness classification framework from Red-Green-Blue (RGB) images that supports both packaged and unpackaged meat datasets. The system classifies four in-distribution (ID) meat classes and uses an out-of-distribution (OOD)-aware abstention mechanism that flags low-confidence samples as No Result. The pipeline combines U-Net-based segmentation with deep feature classifiers. Segmentation is used as a preprocessing step to isolate the meat region and reduce background, producing more consistent inputs for classification. The segmentation module achieved an Intersection over Union (IoU) of 75% and a Dice coefficient of 82%, producing standardized inputs for the classification stage. For classification, we benchmark five backbones: Residual Network-50 (ResNet-50), Vision Transformer-Base/16 (ViT-B/16), Swin Transformer-Tiny (Swin-T), EfficientNet-B0, and MobileNetV3-Small. We use nested 5x3 cross-validation (CV) for model selection and hyperparameter tuning. On the held-out ID test set, EfficientNet-B0 achieves the highest accuracy (98.10%), followed by ResNet-50 and MobileNetV3-Small (both 97.63%) and Swin-T (97.51%), while ViT-B/16 is lower (94.42%). We additionally evaluate OOD scoring and thresholding using standard OOD metrics and sensitivity analysis over the abstention threshold. Finally, we report on-device latency using TensorFlow Lite (TFLite) on a smartphone, highlighting practical accuracy-latency trade-offs for future deployment. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_00368 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Deep Learning-Based Meat Freshness Detection with Segmentation and OOD-Aware Classification Bramantyo, Hutama Arif Faridi, Mukarram Ali Chen, Rui Harris, Clarissa Sun, Yin Machine Learning Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Image and Video Processing In this study, we present a meat freshness classification framework from Red-Green-Blue (RGB) images that supports both packaged and unpackaged meat datasets. The system classifies four in-distribution (ID) meat classes and uses an out-of-distribution (OOD)-aware abstention mechanism that flags low-confidence samples as No Result. The pipeline combines U-Net-based segmentation with deep feature classifiers. Segmentation is used as a preprocessing step to isolate the meat region and reduce background, producing more consistent inputs for classification. The segmentation module achieved an Intersection over Union (IoU) of 75% and a Dice coefficient of 82%, producing standardized inputs for the classification stage. For classification, we benchmark five backbones: Residual Network-50 (ResNet-50), Vision Transformer-Base/16 (ViT-B/16), Swin Transformer-Tiny (Swin-T), EfficientNet-B0, and MobileNetV3-Small. We use nested 5x3 cross-validation (CV) for model selection and hyperparameter tuning. On the held-out ID test set, EfficientNet-B0 achieves the highest accuracy (98.10%), followed by ResNet-50 and MobileNetV3-Small (both 97.63%) and Swin-T (97.51%), while ViT-B/16 is lower (94.42%). We additionally evaluate OOD scoring and thresholding using standard OOD metrics and sensitivity analysis over the abstention threshold. Finally, we report on-device latency using TensorFlow Lite (TFLite) on a smartphone, highlighting practical accuracy-latency trade-offs for future deployment. |
| title | Deep Learning-Based Meat Freshness Detection with Segmentation and OOD-Aware Classification |
| topic | Machine Learning Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Image and Video Processing |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00368 |