Probing Materials Knowledge in LLMs: From Latent Embeddings to Reliable Predictions
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866914363258961920 |
|---|---|
| author | Venugopal, Vineeth Mahjoubi, Soroush Olivetti, Elsa |
| author_facet | Venugopal, Vineeth Mahjoubi, Soroush Olivetti, Elsa |
| contents | Large language models are increasingly applied to materials science, yet fundamental questions remain about their reliability and knowledge encoding. Evaluating 25 LLMs across four materials science tasks -- over 200 base and fine-tuned configurations -- we find that output modality fundamentally determines model behavior. For symbolic tasks, fine-tuning converges to consistent, verifiable answers with reduced response entropy, while for numerical tasks, fine-tuning improves prediction accuracy but models remain inconsistent across repeated inference runs, limiting their reliability as quantitative predictors. For numerical regression, we find that better performance can be obtained by extracting embeddings directly from intermediate transformer layers than from model text output, revealing an ``LLM head bottleneck,'' though this effect is property- and dataset-dependent. Finally, we present a longitudinal study of GPT model performance in materials science, tracking four models over 18 months and observing 9--43\% performance variation that poses reproducibility challenges for scientific applications. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_01834 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Probing Materials Knowledge in LLMs: From Latent Embeddings to Reliable Predictions Venugopal, Vineeth Mahjoubi, Soroush Olivetti, Elsa Materials Science Machine Learning Large language models are increasingly applied to materials science, yet fundamental questions remain about their reliability and knowledge encoding. Evaluating 25 LLMs across four materials science tasks -- over 200 base and fine-tuned configurations -- we find that output modality fundamentally determines model behavior. For symbolic tasks, fine-tuning converges to consistent, verifiable answers with reduced response entropy, while for numerical tasks, fine-tuning improves prediction accuracy but models remain inconsistent across repeated inference runs, limiting their reliability as quantitative predictors. For numerical regression, we find that better performance can be obtained by extracting embeddings directly from intermediate transformer layers than from model text output, revealing an ``LLM head bottleneck,'' though this effect is property- and dataset-dependent. Finally, we present a longitudinal study of GPT model performance in materials science, tracking four models over 18 months and observing 9--43\% performance variation that poses reproducibility challenges for scientific applications. |
| title | Probing Materials Knowledge in LLMs: From Latent Embeddings to Reliable Predictions |
| topic | Materials Science Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01834 |