Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02153 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911479502995456 |
|---|---|
| author | Medrano, Luigi Verma, Arush Chhabra, Mukul |
| author_facet | Medrano, Luigi Verma, Arush Chhabra, Mukul |
| contents | Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems commonly adopt retrieval fusion techniques such as multi-query retrieval and reciprocal rank fusion (RRF) to increase document recall, under the assumption that higher recall leads to better answer quality. While these methods show consistent gains in isolated retrieval benchmarks, their effectiveness under realistic production constraints remains underexplored. In this work, we evaluate retrieval fusion in a production-style RAG pipeline operating over an enterprise knowledge base, with fixed retrieval depth, re-ranking budgets, and latency constraints.
Across multiple fusion configurations, we find that retrieval fusion does increase raw recall, but these gains are largely neutralized after re-ranking and truncation. In our setting, fusion variants fail to outperform single-query baselines on KB-level Top-$k$ accuracy, with Hit@10 decreasing from $0.51$ to $0.48$ in several configurations. Moreover, fusion introduces additional latency overhead due to query rewriting and larger candidate sets, without corresponding improvements in downstream effectiveness.
Our analysis suggests that recall-oriented fusion techniques exhibit diminishing returns once realistic re-ranking limits and context budgets are applied. We conclude that retrieval-level improvements do not reliably translate into end-to-end gains in production RAG systems, and argue for evaluation frameworks that jointly consider retrieval quality, system efficiency, and downstream impact. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_02153 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Scaling Retrieval Augmented Generation with RAG Fusion: Lessons from an Industry Deployment Medrano, Luigi Verma, Arush Chhabra, Mukul Information Retrieval Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems commonly adopt retrieval fusion techniques such as multi-query retrieval and reciprocal rank fusion (RRF) to increase document recall, under the assumption that higher recall leads to better answer quality. While these methods show consistent gains in isolated retrieval benchmarks, their effectiveness under realistic production constraints remains underexplored. In this work, we evaluate retrieval fusion in a production-style RAG pipeline operating over an enterprise knowledge base, with fixed retrieval depth, re-ranking budgets, and latency constraints. Across multiple fusion configurations, we find that retrieval fusion does increase raw recall, but these gains are largely neutralized after re-ranking and truncation. In our setting, fusion variants fail to outperform single-query baselines on KB-level Top-$k$ accuracy, with Hit@10 decreasing from $0.51$ to $0.48$ in several configurations. Moreover, fusion introduces additional latency overhead due to query rewriting and larger candidate sets, without corresponding improvements in downstream effectiveness. Our analysis suggests that recall-oriented fusion techniques exhibit diminishing returns once realistic re-ranking limits and context budgets are applied. We conclude that retrieval-level improvements do not reliably translate into end-to-end gains in production RAG systems, and argue for evaluation frameworks that jointly consider retrieval quality, system efficiency, and downstream impact. |
| title | Scaling Retrieval Augmented Generation with RAG Fusion: Lessons from an Industry Deployment |
| topic | Information Retrieval Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02153 |