Testing Full Mediation of Treatment Effects and the Identifiability of Causal Mechanisms

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huber, Martin, Kloiber, Kevin, Lafférs, Lukáš
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866908866038464512
author Huber, Martin
Kloiber, Kevin
Lafférs, Lukáš
author_facet Huber, Martin
Kloiber, Kevin
Lafférs, Lukáš
contents In causal analysis, understanding the causal mechanisms through which an intervention or treatment affects an outcome is often of central interest. We propose a test to evaluate (i) whether the causal effect of a treatment that is randomly assigned conditional on covariates is fully mediated by, or operates exclusively through, observed intermediate outcomes (referred to as mediators or surrogate outcomes), and (ii) whether the various causal mechanisms operating through different mediators are identifiable conditional on covariates. We demonstrate that if both full mediation and identification of causal mechanisms hold, then the conditionally random treatment is conditionally independent of the outcome given the mediators and covariates. Furthermore, we extend our framework to settings with non-randomly assigned treatments. We show that, in this case, full mediation remains testable, while identification of causal mechanisms is no longer guaranteed. We propose a double machine learning framework for implementing the test that can incorporate high-dimensional covariates and is root-n consistent and asymptotically normal under specific regularity conditions. We also present a simulation study demonstrating good finite-sample performance of our method, along with two empirical applications revisiting randomized experiments on maternal mental health and social norms.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_04109
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Testing Full Mediation of Treatment Effects and the Identifiability of Causal Mechanisms
Huber, Martin
Kloiber, Kevin
Lafférs, Lukáš
Econometrics
Machine Learning
In causal analysis, understanding the causal mechanisms through which an intervention or treatment affects an outcome is often of central interest. We propose a test to evaluate (i) whether the causal effect of a treatment that is randomly assigned conditional on covariates is fully mediated by, or operates exclusively through, observed intermediate outcomes (referred to as mediators or surrogate outcomes), and (ii) whether the various causal mechanisms operating through different mediators are identifiable conditional on covariates. We demonstrate that if both full mediation and identification of causal mechanisms hold, then the conditionally random treatment is conditionally independent of the outcome given the mediators and covariates. Furthermore, we extend our framework to settings with non-randomly assigned treatments. We show that, in this case, full mediation remains testable, while identification of causal mechanisms is no longer guaranteed. We propose a double machine learning framework for implementing the test that can incorporate high-dimensional covariates and is root-n consistent and asymptotically normal under specific regularity conditions. We also present a simulation study demonstrating good finite-sample performance of our method, along with two empirical applications revisiting randomized experiments on maternal mental health and social norms.
title Testing Full Mediation of Treatment Effects and the Identifiability of Causal Mechanisms
topic Econometrics
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04109