Zigbee vs. Matter over Thread: Understanding IoT Protocol Performance in Practice

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Nobile, Massimo, Palmese, Fabio, Boiano, Antonio, Redondi, Alessandro E. C., Cesana, Matteo
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866917314395373568
author Nobile, Massimo
Palmese, Fabio
Boiano, Antonio
Redondi, Alessandro E. C.
Cesana, Matteo
author_facet Nobile, Massimo
Palmese, Fabio
Boiano, Antonio
Redondi, Alessandro E. C.
Cesana, Matteo
contents The widespread adoption of the Internet of Things (IoT) has positioned smart homes as paradigmatic examples of distributed automation systems, where reliability, efficiency, and interoperability depend critically on the underlying communication protocol. Among the low-power wireless technologies available for this scenario, Zigbee and Matter over Thread have emerged as leading contenders. While Zigbee represents a mature, non-IP mesh networking solution, Matter over Thread introduces an IP-based architecture designed to unify device interoperability across different ecosystems. However, despite extensive documentation of their design principles, there is a lack of empirical, comparative performance data under realistic network conditions. This paper presents a comprehensive experimental comparison between the two protocols, conducted on a testbed built from commercially available hardware. The proposed methodology focuses on different key performance dimensions, such as scalability, responsiveness, and fault tolerance. The results reveal that Zigbee achieves a lower baseline overhead and faster route recovery, making it more responsive in static small-scale deployments. Matter over Thread, conversely, exhibits superior scalability and robustness, maintaining stable throughput and predictable latency across multi-hop scenarios. Overall, we highlight that Zigbee and Matter over Thread embody distinct trade-offs between agility, efficiency, and scalability.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_04221
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Zigbee vs. Matter over Thread: Understanding IoT Protocol Performance in Practice
Nobile, Massimo
Palmese, Fabio
Boiano, Antonio
Redondi, Alessandro E. C.
Cesana, Matteo
Networking and Internet Architecture
The widespread adoption of the Internet of Things (IoT) has positioned smart homes as paradigmatic examples of distributed automation systems, where reliability, efficiency, and interoperability depend critically on the underlying communication protocol. Among the low-power wireless technologies available for this scenario, Zigbee and Matter over Thread have emerged as leading contenders. While Zigbee represents a mature, non-IP mesh networking solution, Matter over Thread introduces an IP-based architecture designed to unify device interoperability across different ecosystems. However, despite extensive documentation of their design principles, there is a lack of empirical, comparative performance data under realistic network conditions. This paper presents a comprehensive experimental comparison between the two protocols, conducted on a testbed built from commercially available hardware. The proposed methodology focuses on different key performance dimensions, such as scalability, responsiveness, and fault tolerance. The results reveal that Zigbee achieves a lower baseline overhead and faster route recovery, making it more responsive in static small-scale deployments. Matter over Thread, conversely, exhibits superior scalability and robustness, maintaining stable throughput and predictable latency across multi-hop scenarios. Overall, we highlight that Zigbee and Matter over Thread embody distinct trade-offs between agility, efficiency, and scalability.
title Zigbee vs. Matter over Thread: Understanding IoT Protocol Performance in Practice
topic Networking and Internet Architecture
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04221