Image de couverture de livre

Guidelines for the Annotation and Visualization of Legal Argumentation Structures in Chinese Judicial Decisions

Fuente: arXiv

Enregistré dans:

Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux:	Chen, Kun, Liao, Xianglei, Fei, Kaixue, Xing, Yi, Li, Xinrui
Format:	Preprint
Publié:	2026
Sujets:	Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence
Accès en ligne:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Ajouter un tag Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!

Documents similaires

Structural Dilemmas and Developmental Pathways of Legal Argument Mining in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
par: Liao, Xianglei, et autres
Publié: (2026)

AgentsCourt: Building Judicial Decision-Making Agents with Court Debate Simulation and Legal Knowledge Augmentation
par: He, Zhitao, et autres
Publié: (2024)

ClaimGen-CN: A Large-scale Chinese Dataset for Legal Claim Generation
par: Zhou, Siying, et autres
Publié: (2025)

From Legal Text to Executable Decision Models: Evaluating Structured Representations for Legal Decision Model Generation
par: Graus, David
Publié: (2026)

LegalChainReasoner: A Legal Chain-guided Framework for Criminal Judicial Opinion Generation
par: Shi, Weizhe, et autres
Publié: (2025)

CasiMedicos-Arg: A Medical Question Answering Dataset Annotated with Explanatory Argumentative Structures
par: Sviridova, Ekaterina, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Predicate-Argument Structure Divergences in Chinese and English Parallel Sentences and their Impact on Language Transfer
par: Tripodi, Rocco, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Repurposing Annotation Guidelines to Instruct LLM Annotators: A Case Study
par: Kim, Kon Woo, et autres
Publié: (2025)

ALARB: An Arabic Legal Argument Reasoning Benchmark
par: Shairah, Harethah Abu, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Can Large Language Models Predict the Outcome of Judicial Decisions?
par: Kmainasi, Mohamed Bayan, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Argumentation for Explainable and Globally Contestable Decision Support with LLMs
par: Dejl, Adam, et autres
Publié: (2026)

CliCARE: Grounding Large Language Models in Clinical Guidelines for Decision Support over Longitudinal Cancer Electronic Health Records
par: Li, Dongchen, et autres
Publié: (2025)

End-to-End Argument Mining through Autoregressive Argumentative Structure Prediction
par: Das, Nilmadhab, et autres
Publié: (2025)

LawGPT: A Chinese Legal Knowledge-Enhanced Large Language Model
par: Zhou, Zhi, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Towards Supporting Legal Argumentation with NLP: Is More Data Really All You Need?
par: Santosh, T. Y. S. S, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Are Large Language Models Reliable Argument Quality Annotators?
par: Mirzakhmedova, Nailia, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Lawma: The Power of Specialization for Legal Annotation
par: Dominguez-Olmedo, Ricardo, et autres
Publié: (2024)

WisdomInterrogatory (LuWen): An Open-Source Legal Large Language Model Technical Report
par: Wu, Yiquan, et autres
Publié: (2026)

LAR-ECHR: A New Legal Argument Reasoning Task and Dataset for Cases of the European Court of Human Rights
par: Chlapanis, Odysseas S., et autres
Publié: (2024)

STRUX: An LLM for Decision-Making with Structured Explanations
par: Lu, Yiming, et autres
Publié: (2024)

JUREX-4E: Juridical Expert-Annotated Four-Element Knowledge Base for Legal Reasoning
par: Liu, Huanghai, et autres
Publié: (2025)

DMON: A Simple yet Effective Approach for Argument Structure Learning
par: Sun, Wei, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Strategic Persuasion with Trait-Conditioned Multi-Agent Systems for Iterative Legal Argumentation
par: Siedler, Philipp D.
Publié: (2026)

Understanding Enthymemes in Argument Maps: Bridging Argument Mining and Logic-based Argumentation
par: Ben-Naim, Jonathan, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Discovering Significant Topics from Legal Decisions with Selective Inference
par: Soh, Jerrold
Publié: (2024)

Mining Legal Arguments to Study Judicial Formalism
par: Koref, Tomáš, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Universal Legal Article Prediction via Tight Collaboration between Supervised Classification Model and LLM
par: Chi, Xiao, et autres
Publié: (2025)

AnnoCaseLaw: A Richly-Annotated Dataset For Benchmarking Explainable Legal Judgment Prediction
par: Sesodia, Magnus, et autres
Publié: (2025)

From Query to Counsel: Structured Reasoning with a Multi-Agent Framework and Dataset for Legal Consultation
par: Lu, Mingfei, et autres
Publié: (2026)

Structured Definitions and Segmentations for Legal Reasoning in LLMs: A Study on Indian Legal Data
par: Khatri, Mann, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Enforcing Monotonic Progress in Legal Cross-Examination: Preventing Long-Horizon Stagnation in LLM-Based Inquiry
par: Liao, Hsien-Jyh
Publié: (2026)

Annotation Guidelines-Based Knowledge Augmentation: Towards Enhancing Large Language Models for Educational Text Classification
par: Liu, Shiqi, et autres
Publié: (2024)

MultiJustice: A Chinese Dataset for Multi-Party, Multi-Charge Legal Prediction
par: Wang, Xiao, et autres
Publié: (2025)

No Argument Left Behind: Overlapping Chunks for Faster Processing of Arbitrarily Long Legal Texts
par: Fama, Israel, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Enhancing Large Language Models for Clinical Decision Support by Incorporating Clinical Practice Guidelines
par: Oniani, David, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Can Large Language Models Follow Concept Annotation Guidelines? A Case Study on Scientific and Financial Domains
par: Fonseca, Marcio, et autres
Publié: (2023)

Synthesized Annotation Guidelines are Knowledge-Lite Boosters for Clinical Information Extraction
par: Hsu, Enshuo, et autres
Publié: (2025)

JuDGE: Benchmarking Judgment Document Generation for Chinese Legal System
par: Su, Weihang, et autres
Publié: (2025)

CMDAG: A Chinese Metaphor Dataset with Annotated Grounds as CoT for Boosting Metaphor Generation
par: Shao, Yujie, et autres
Publié: (2024)

LawGPT: Knowledge-Guided Data Generation and Its Application to Legal LLM
par: Zhou, Zhi, et autres
Publié: (2025)