Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Janeček, Václav, Sartor, Giovanni
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05392
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866918373146755072
author Janeček, Václav
Sartor, Giovanni
author_facet Janeček, Václav
Sartor, Giovanni
contents AI and Law research has encountered legal interpretation in different ways, in the context of its evolving approaches and methodologies. Research on expert system has focused on legal knowledge engineering, with the goal of ensuring that human-generated interpretations can be precisely transferred into knowledge-bases, to be consistently applied. Research on argumentation has aimed at representing the structure of interpretive arguments, as well as their dialectical interactions, to assess of the acceptability of interpretive claims within argumentation frameworks. Research on machine learning has focused on the automated generation of interpretive suggestions and arguments, through general and specialised language models, now being increasingly deployed in legal practice.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_05392
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Legal interpretation and AI: from expert systems to argumentation and LLMs
Janeček, Václav
Sartor, Giovanni
Artificial Intelligence
AI and Law research has encountered legal interpretation in different ways, in the context of its evolving approaches and methodologies. Research on expert system has focused on legal knowledge engineering, with the goal of ensuring that human-generated interpretations can be precisely transferred into knowledge-bases, to be consistently applied. Research on argumentation has aimed at representing the structure of interpretive arguments, as well as their dialectical interactions, to assess of the acceptability of interpretive claims within argumentation frameworks. Research on machine learning has focused on the automated generation of interpretive suggestions and arguments, through general and specialised language models, now being increasingly deployed in legal practice.
title Legal interpretation and AI: from expert systems to argumentation and LLMs
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05392