Test-then-Punish: A Statistical Approach to Repeated Games
Fuente:
arXiv
Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Publié: |
2026
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866911489977221120 |
|---|---|
| author | Capitaine, Aymeric Scheid, Antoine Boursier, Etienne Durmus, Alain Jordan, Michael I. |
| author_facet | Capitaine, Aymeric Scheid, Antoine Boursier, Etienne Durmus, Alain Jordan, Michael I. |
| contents | We study discounted infinitely repeated games in which players agree on a cooperative mixed action profile but, at each step, observe only the realized pure actions. This form of imperfect monitoring breaks classical trigger strategies, since deviations cannot be identified with certainty. To address this problem, we study how hypothesis testing can be used to sustain cooperation. First, we develop a framework that embeds statistical inference directly into strategic behavior. We introduce relaxed equilibrium notions that allow players to ignore vanishing probability histories arising from rare but extreme realizations of the monitoring process. Within this framework, we formalize a generic test then punish strategy: players commit ex ante to a cooperative mixed action profile, continuously test whether observed play is consistent with this prescription, and permanently switch to punishment once sufficient statistical evidence of deviation accumulates. Under mild conditions on the testing procedure, this construction sustains any feasible and individually rational payoff for sufficiently patient players, yielding a Folk theorem type result under imperfect monitoring. We then propose two explicit implementations of this strategy. The first relies on anytime valid sequential tests, providing uniform control of Type I error over an infinite horizon and a finite expected detection time for payoff-relevant deviations. However, this strategy only accounts for stationary deviations and yields a Nash equilibrium. The second uses testing over batches with a fixed size, accommodating arbitrary deviations and achieving subgame perfect Nash equilibrium, at the cost of losing global anytime guarantees on false punishments. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_05619 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Test-then-Punish: A Statistical Approach to Repeated Games Capitaine, Aymeric Scheid, Antoine Boursier, Etienne Durmus, Alain Jordan, Michael I. Applications Computer Science and Game Theory We study discounted infinitely repeated games in which players agree on a cooperative mixed action profile but, at each step, observe only the realized pure actions. This form of imperfect monitoring breaks classical trigger strategies, since deviations cannot be identified with certainty. To address this problem, we study how hypothesis testing can be used to sustain cooperation. First, we develop a framework that embeds statistical inference directly into strategic behavior. We introduce relaxed equilibrium notions that allow players to ignore vanishing probability histories arising from rare but extreme realizations of the monitoring process. Within this framework, we formalize a generic test then punish strategy: players commit ex ante to a cooperative mixed action profile, continuously test whether observed play is consistent with this prescription, and permanently switch to punishment once sufficient statistical evidence of deviation accumulates. Under mild conditions on the testing procedure, this construction sustains any feasible and individually rational payoff for sufficiently patient players, yielding a Folk theorem type result under imperfect monitoring. We then propose two explicit implementations of this strategy. The first relies on anytime valid sequential tests, providing uniform control of Type I error over an infinite horizon and a finite expected detection time for payoff-relevant deviations. However, this strategy only accounts for stationary deviations and yields a Nash equilibrium. The second uses testing over batches with a fixed size, accommodating arbitrary deviations and achieving subgame perfect Nash equilibrium, at the cost of losing global anytime guarantees on false punishments. |
| title | Test-then-Punish: A Statistical Approach to Repeated Games |
| topic | Applications Computer Science and Game Theory |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05619 |