InfoGatherer: Principled Information Seeking via Evidence Retrieval and Strategic Questioning
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866915839152750592 |
|---|---|
| author | Taranukhin, Maksym Li, Shuyue Stella Milios, Evangelos Pleiss, Geoff Tsvetkov, Yulia Shwartz, Vered |
| author_facet | Taranukhin, Maksym Li, Shuyue Stella Milios, Evangelos Pleiss, Geoff Tsvetkov, Yulia Shwartz, Vered |
| contents | LLMs are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains such as medical triage and legal assistance, often as document-grounded QA systems in which a user provides a description, relevant sources are retrieved, and an LLM generates a prediction. In practice, initial user queries are often underspecified, and a single retrieval pass is insufficient for reliable decision-making, leading to incorrect and overly confident answers. While follow-up questioning can elicit missing information, existing methods typically depend on implicit, unstructured confidence signals from the LLM, making it difficult to determine what remains unknown, what information matters most, and when to stop asking questions. We propose InfoGatherer, a framework that gathers missing information from two complementary sources: retrieved domain documents and targeted follow-up questions to the user. InfoGatherer models uncertainty using Dempster-Shafer belief assignments over a structured evidential network, enabling principled fusion of incomplete and potentially contradictory evidence from both sources without prematurely collapsing to a definitive answer. Across legal and medical tasks, InfoGatherer outperforms strong baselines while requiring fewer turns. By grounding uncertainty in formal evidential theory rather than heuristic LLM signals, InfoGatherer moves towards trustworthy, interpretable decision support in domains where reliability is critical. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_05909 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | InfoGatherer: Principled Information Seeking via Evidence Retrieval and Strategic Questioning Taranukhin, Maksym Li, Shuyue Stella Milios, Evangelos Pleiss, Geoff Tsvetkov, Yulia Shwartz, Vered Computation and Language LLMs are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains such as medical triage and legal assistance, often as document-grounded QA systems in which a user provides a description, relevant sources are retrieved, and an LLM generates a prediction. In practice, initial user queries are often underspecified, and a single retrieval pass is insufficient for reliable decision-making, leading to incorrect and overly confident answers. While follow-up questioning can elicit missing information, existing methods typically depend on implicit, unstructured confidence signals from the LLM, making it difficult to determine what remains unknown, what information matters most, and when to stop asking questions. We propose InfoGatherer, a framework that gathers missing information from two complementary sources: retrieved domain documents and targeted follow-up questions to the user. InfoGatherer models uncertainty using Dempster-Shafer belief assignments over a structured evidential network, enabling principled fusion of incomplete and potentially contradictory evidence from both sources without prematurely collapsing to a definitive answer. Across legal and medical tasks, InfoGatherer outperforms strong baselines while requiring fewer turns. By grounding uncertainty in formal evidential theory rather than heuristic LLM signals, InfoGatherer moves towards trustworthy, interpretable decision support in domains where reliability is critical. |
| title | InfoGatherer: Principled Information Seeking via Evidence Retrieval and Strategic Questioning |
| topic | Computation and Language |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05909 |