:: Library Catalog

Image de couverture de livre

Enregistré dans:

Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux:	Oyshi, Uttamasha Anjally, Nkhata, Gibson, Gauch, Susan
Format:	Preprint
Publié:	2026
Sujets:	Computers and Society
Accès en ligne:	https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06641
Tags:	Ajouter un tag Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!

Documents similaires

Verifying Rumors via Stance-Aware Structural Modeling
par: Nkhata, Gibson, et autres
Publié: (2025)

ClusterRAG: Cluster-Based Collaborative Filtering for Personalized Retrieval-Augmented Generation
par: Nkhata, Gibson, et autres
Publié: (2026)

From Bias to Balance: Fairness-Aware Paper Recommendation for Equitable Peer Review
par: Oyshi, Uttamasha Anjally, et autres
Publié: (2026)

Fair Learning for Bias Mitigation and Quality Optimization in Paper Recommendation
par: Oyshi, Uttamasha Anjally, et autres
Publié: (2026)

Mind2: Mind-to-Mind Emotional Support System with Bidirectional Cognitive Discourse Analysis
par: Hong, Shi Yin, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Intermediate-Task Transfer Learning: Leveraging Sarcasm Detection for Stance Detection
par: Nkhata, Gibson, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Fine-tuning BERT with Bidirectional LSTM for Fine-grained Movie Reviews Sentiment Analysis
par: Nkhata, Gibson, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Sarcasm Detection as a Catalyst: Improving Stance Detection with Cross-Target Capabilities
par: Hong, Gibson Nkhata Shi Yin, et autres
Publié: (2025)

AI and the Future of Academic Peer Review
par: Mann, Sebastian Porsdam, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Sentiment Analysis of Movie Reviews Using BERT
par: Nkhata, Gibson, et autres
Publié: (2025)

The Vision Digital Video Library.
par: Gauch, Susan, et autres
Publié: (1997)

Commitment Checklist: Auditing Author Commitments in Peer Review
par: Chen, Chung-Chi, et autres
Publié: (2026)

The Good, the Bad and the Constructive: Automatically Measuring Peer Review's Utility for Authors
par: Sadallah, Abdelrahman, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards
par: Kim, Jaeho, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Beyond Detection: Governing GenAI in Academic Peer Review as a Sociotechnical Challenge
par: Chakravorti, Tatiana, et autres
Publié: (2026)

What Drives Paper Acceptance? A Process-Centric Analysis of Modern Peer Review
par: Jung, Sangkeun, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Reviewing the Reviewer: Elevating Peer Review Quality through LLM-Guided Feedback
par: Purkayastha, Sukannya, et autres
Publié: (2026)

AI-Augmented Peer Review and Scientific Productivity: A Cross-Country Panel and SEM Analysis
par: Han, Dongsoo
Publié: (2026)

Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers
par: Paul, Uchswas, et autres
Publié: (2025)

BeerReview: A Blockchain-enabled Peer Review Platform
par: Jin, Guodong, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Missing the Margins: A Systematic Literature Review on the Demographic Representativeness of LLMs
par: Sen, Indira, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Research Integrity and Academic Authority in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: From Discovery to Curation?
par: Chesterman, Simon, et autres
Publié: (2026)

Dispute Resolution in Peer Review with Abstract Argumentation and OWL DL
par: Baimuratov, Ildar, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Insights from the ICLR Peer Review and Rebuttal Process
par: Kargaran, Amir Hossein, et autres
Publié: (2025)

The AI Review Lottery: Widespread AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Boost Paper Scores and Acceptance Rates
par: Latona, Giuseppe Russo, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Peer-induced Fairness: A Causal Approach for Algorithmic Fairness Auditing
par: Fang, Shiqi, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Understanding and Supporting Peer Review Using AI-reframed Positive Summary
par: Yang, Chi-Lan, et autres
Publié: (2025)

When Your Reviewer is an LLM: Biases, Divergence, and Prompt Injection Risks in Peer Review
par: Zhu, Changjia, et autres
Publié: (2025)

A Randomized Controlled Trial on Anonymizing Reviewers to Each Other in Peer Review Discussions
par: Rastogi, Charvi, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Benchmark on Peer Review Toxic Detection: A Challenging Task with a New Dataset
par: Luo, Man, et autres
Publié: (2025)

DeepReviewer 2.0: A Traceable Agentic System for Auditable Scientific Peer Review
par: Weng, Yixuan, et autres
Publié: (2026)

Position on LLM-Assisted Peer Review: Addressing Reviewer Gap through Mentoring and Feedback
par: Yun, JungMin, et autres
Publié: (2026)

Do LLMs Favor LLMs? Quantifying Interaction Effects in Peer Review
par: Sharma, Vibhhu, et autres
Publié: (2026)

Early Academic Capital as the Causal Origin of Dropout in Constrained Educational Systems -- Evidence from Longitudinal Data and Structural Causal Models
par: Paz, Hugo Roger
Publié: (2026)

Justice in Judgment: Unveiling (Hidden) Bias in LLM-assisted Peer Reviews
par: Vasu, Sai Suresh Macharla, et autres
Publié: (2025)

To Trust or Not to Trust: Authors' Response to AI-based Reviews
par: Leblanc, César, et autres
Publié: (2026)

Hidden Prompts in Manuscripts Exploit AI-Assisted Peer Review
par: Lin, Zhicheng
Publié: (2025)

Group Fairness in Peer Review
par: Aziz, Haris, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Scaling Success: A Systematic Review of Peer Grading Strategies for Accuracy, Efficiency, and Learning in Contemporary Education
par: Paul, Uchswas, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Penalizing Transparency? How AI Disclosure and Author Demographics Shape Human and AI Judgments About Writing
par: Cheong, Inyoung, et autres
Publié: (2025)