Can Safety Emerge from Weak Supervision? A Systematic Analysis of Small Language Models
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866915842131755008 |
|---|---|
| author | Saha, Punyajoy Halder, Sudipta Mondal, Debjyoti Panda, Subhadarshi |
| author_facet | Saha, Punyajoy Halder, Sudipta Mondal, Debjyoti Panda, Subhadarshi |
| contents | Safety alignment is critical for deploying large language models (LLMs) in real-world applications, yet most existing approaches rely on large human-annotated datasets and static red-teaming benchmarks that are costly, difficult to scale, and slow to adapt to evolving model behaviors. Moreover, overly conservative safety mechanisms can reduce model usefulness by rejecting sensitive but legitimate queries. We introduce Self-MOA (Self Multi-Objective Alignment), a fully automated framework for aligning small language models using weak supervision from automated evaluator models. Self-MOA operates as a closed loop that dynamically generates model-specific red team prompts, constructs preference data from model-generated responses, and aligns models via multi-objective preference optimization to jointly optimize for safety and helpfulness. Across multiple small language models and safety benchmarks, Self-MOA achieves a 12.41\% improvement in safety while preserving helpfulness, using as little as 11 times less training data than human-supervised alignment baselines. These results demonstrate that adaptive, automated alignment can reduce the dependence on static, human-curated safety pipelines in resource-constrained settings. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_07017 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Can Safety Emerge from Weak Supervision? A Systematic Analysis of Small Language Models Saha, Punyajoy Halder, Sudipta Mondal, Debjyoti Panda, Subhadarshi Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Safety alignment is critical for deploying large language models (LLMs) in real-world applications, yet most existing approaches rely on large human-annotated datasets and static red-teaming benchmarks that are costly, difficult to scale, and slow to adapt to evolving model behaviors. Moreover, overly conservative safety mechanisms can reduce model usefulness by rejecting sensitive but legitimate queries. We introduce Self-MOA (Self Multi-Objective Alignment), a fully automated framework for aligning small language models using weak supervision from automated evaluator models. Self-MOA operates as a closed loop that dynamically generates model-specific red team prompts, constructs preference data from model-generated responses, and aligns models via multi-objective preference optimization to jointly optimize for safety and helpfulness. Across multiple small language models and safety benchmarks, Self-MOA achieves a 12.41\% improvement in safety while preserving helpfulness, using as little as 11 times less training data than human-supervised alignment baselines. These results demonstrate that adaptive, automated alignment can reduce the dependence on static, human-curated safety pipelines in resource-constrained settings. |
| title | Can Safety Emerge from Weak Supervision? A Systematic Analysis of Small Language Models |
| topic | Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07017 |