Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Rizoiu, Marian-Andrei, Khuu, Duy, Law, Andrew, Largeron, Christine
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07509
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866918378693722112
author Rizoiu, Marian-Andrei
Khuu, Duy
Law, Andrew
Largeron, Christine
author_facet Rizoiu, Marian-Andrei
Khuu, Duy
Law, Andrew
Largeron, Christine
contents Political polarisation on structured discussion platforms such as Reddit differs fundamentally from that on broadcast platforms such as Twitter/X, yet most prior work targets the latter. We present an end-to-end framework for measuring and analysing polarisation dynamics, applied to the r/Brexit subreddit (871K submissions, November 2015 -- February 2021). We construct r/Brexit, a crowd-annotated stance dataset of 5,895 labelled submissions (inter-annotator agreement = 0.804), and train a domain-adapted BERT classifier. We introduce a continuous polarity metric that replaces discrete stance categories, revealing fine-grained opinion spectra across 27 politically-defined periods. Our analysis yields three key findings: (a) future stance prediction is confounded by survivorship bias: persuadable users disengage, and those who remain are already entrenched; (b) echo chambers are quantifiably dominant, with nearly 40% of interactions between like-minded users; (c) user current polarity is the dominant predictor of future polarity, with echo-chamber immersion as the secondary predictive signal. These findings reveal that Reddit's partisan core is entrenched by self-selection, not softened by cross-cutting exposure.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_07509
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Brexit Means Brexit: Selection Bias, Echo Chambers, and Entrenched Opinion on Reddit
Rizoiu, Marian-Andrei
Khuu, Duy
Law, Andrew
Largeron, Christine
Computers and Society
Social and Information Networks
Political polarisation on structured discussion platforms such as Reddit differs fundamentally from that on broadcast platforms such as Twitter/X, yet most prior work targets the latter. We present an end-to-end framework for measuring and analysing polarisation dynamics, applied to the r/Brexit subreddit (871K submissions, November 2015 -- February 2021). We construct r/Brexit, a crowd-annotated stance dataset of 5,895 labelled submissions (inter-annotator agreement = 0.804), and train a domain-adapted BERT classifier. We introduce a continuous polarity metric that replaces discrete stance categories, revealing fine-grained opinion spectra across 27 politically-defined periods. Our analysis yields three key findings: (a) future stance prediction is confounded by survivorship bias: persuadable users disengage, and those who remain are already entrenched; (b) echo chambers are quantifiably dominant, with nearly 40% of interactions between like-minded users; (c) user current polarity is the dominant predictor of future polarity, with echo-chamber immersion as the secondary predictive signal. These findings reveal that Reddit's partisan core is entrenched by self-selection, not softened by cross-cutting exposure.
title Brexit Means Brexit: Selection Bias, Echo Chambers, and Entrenched Opinion on Reddit
topic Computers and Society
Social and Information Networks
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07509