ConflictBench: Evaluating Human-AI Conflict via Interactive and Visually Grounded Environments

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Zhao, Weixiang, Li, Haozhen, Zhao, Yanyan, zhi, xuda, Huang, Yongbo, He, Hao, Qin, Bing, Liu, Ting
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866912954674315264
author Zhao, Weixiang
Li, Haozhen
Zhao, Yanyan
zhi, xuda
Huang, Yongbo
He, Hao
Qin, Bing
Liu, Ting
author_facet Zhao, Weixiang
Li, Haozhen
Zhao, Yanyan
zhi, xuda
Huang, Yongbo
He, Hao
Qin, Bing
Liu, Ting
contents As large language models (LLMs) evolve into autonomous agents capable of acting in open-ended environments, ensuring behavioral alignment with human values becomes a critical safety concern. Existing benchmarks, focused on static, single-turn prompts, fail to capture the interactive and multi-modal nature of real-world conflicts. We introduce ConflictBench, a benchmark for evaluating human-AI conflict through 150 multi-turn scenarios derived from prior alignment queries. ConflictBench integrates a text-based simulation engine with a visually grounded world model, enabling agents to perceive, plan, and act under dynamic conditions. Empirical results show that while agents often act safely when human harm is immediate, they frequently prioritize self-preservation or adopt deceptive strategies in delayed or low-risk settings. A regret test further reveals that aligned decisions are often reversed under escalating pressure, especially with visual input. These findings underscore the need for interaction-level, multi-modal evaluation to surface alignment failures that remain hidden in conventional benchmarks.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_08024
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle ConflictBench: Evaluating Human-AI Conflict via Interactive and Visually Grounded Environments
Zhao, Weixiang
Li, Haozhen
Zhao, Yanyan
zhi, xuda
Huang, Yongbo
He, Hao
Qin, Bing
Liu, Ting
Computation and Language
As large language models (LLMs) evolve into autonomous agents capable of acting in open-ended environments, ensuring behavioral alignment with human values becomes a critical safety concern. Existing benchmarks, focused on static, single-turn prompts, fail to capture the interactive and multi-modal nature of real-world conflicts. We introduce ConflictBench, a benchmark for evaluating human-AI conflict through 150 multi-turn scenarios derived from prior alignment queries. ConflictBench integrates a text-based simulation engine with a visually grounded world model, enabling agents to perceive, plan, and act under dynamic conditions. Empirical results show that while agents often act safely when human harm is immediate, they frequently prioritize self-preservation or adopt deceptive strategies in delayed or low-risk settings. A regret test further reveals that aligned decisions are often reversed under escalating pressure, especially with visual input. These findings underscore the need for interaction-level, multi-modal evaluation to surface alignment failures that remain hidden in conventional benchmarks.
title ConflictBench: Evaluating Human-AI Conflict via Interactive and Visually Grounded Environments
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08024