Comparative Analysis of Patch Attack on VLM-Based Autonomous Driving Architectures

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Fernandez, David, MohajerAnsari, Pedram, Salarpour, Amir, Cheng, Long, Razi, Abolfazl, Pesé, Mert D.
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866912957556850688
author Fernandez, David
MohajerAnsari, Pedram
Salarpour, Amir
Cheng, Long
Razi, Abolfazl
Pesé, Mert D.
author_facet Fernandez, David
MohajerAnsari, Pedram
Salarpour, Amir
Cheng, Long
Razi, Abolfazl
Pesé, Mert D.
contents Vision-language models are emerging for autonomous driving, yet their robustness to physical adversarial attacks remains unexplored. This paper presents a systematic framework for comparative adversarial evaluation across three VLM architectures: Dolphins, OmniDrive (Omni-L), and LeapVAD. Using black-box optimization with semantic homogenization for fair comparison, we evaluate physically realizable patch attacks in CARLA simulation. Results reveal severe vulnerabilities across all architectures, sustained multi-frame failures, and critical object detection degradation. Our analysis exposes distinct architectural vulnerability patterns, demonstrating that current VLM designs inadequately address adversarial threats in safety-critical autonomous driving applications.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_08897
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Comparative Analysis of Patch Attack on VLM-Based Autonomous Driving Architectures
Fernandez, David
MohajerAnsari, Pedram
Salarpour, Amir
Cheng, Long
Razi, Abolfazl
Pesé, Mert D.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Vision-language models are emerging for autonomous driving, yet their robustness to physical adversarial attacks remains unexplored. This paper presents a systematic framework for comparative adversarial evaluation across three VLM architectures: Dolphins, OmniDrive (Omni-L), and LeapVAD. Using black-box optimization with semantic homogenization for fair comparison, we evaluate physically realizable patch attacks in CARLA simulation. Results reveal severe vulnerabilities across all architectures, sustained multi-frame failures, and critical object detection degradation. Our analysis exposes distinct architectural vulnerability patterns, demonstrating that current VLM designs inadequately address adversarial threats in safety-critical autonomous driving applications.
title Comparative Analysis of Patch Attack on VLM-Based Autonomous Driving Architectures
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08897