PRECEPT: Planning Resilience via Experience, Context Engineering & Probing Trajectories A Unified Framework for Test-Time Adaptation with Compositional Rule Learning and Pareto-Guided Prompt Evolution

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Shahmansoori, Arash
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866908877021249536
author Shahmansoori, Arash
author_facet Shahmansoori, Arash
contents LLM agents that store knowledge as natural language suffer steep retrieval degradation as condition count grows, often struggle to compose learned rules reliably, and typically lack explicit mechanisms to detect stale or adversarial knowledge. We introduce PRECEPT, a unified framework for test-time adaptation with three tightly coupled components: (1) deterministic exact-match rule retrieval over structured condition keys, (2) conflict-aware memory with Bayesian source reliability and threshold-based rule invalidation, and (3) COMPASS, a Pareto-guided prompt-evolution outer loop. Exact retrieval eliminates partial-match interpretation errors on the deterministic path (0% by construction, vs 94.4% under Theorem~B.6's independence model at N=10) and supports compositional stacking through a semantic tier hierarchy; conflict-aware memory resolves static--dynamic disagreements and supports drift adaptation; COMPASS evaluates prompts through the same end-to-end execution pipeline. Results (9--10 seeds): PRECEPT achieves a +41.1pp first-try advantage over Full Reflexion (d>1.9), +33.3pp compositional generalization (d=1.55), 100% $P_1$ on 2-way logistics compositions (d=2.64), +40--55pp continuous learning gains, strong eventual robustness under adversarial static knowledge (100% logistics with adversarial SK active; partial recovery on integration), +55.0pp drift recovery (d=0.95, p=0.031), and 61% fewer steps. Core comparisons are statistically significant, often at p<0.001.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_09641
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle PRECEPT: Planning Resilience via Experience, Context Engineering & Probing Trajectories A Unified Framework for Test-Time Adaptation with Compositional Rule Learning and Pareto-Guided Prompt Evolution
Shahmansoori, Arash
Artificial Intelligence
Information Retrieval
I.2.11; I.2.6; H.3.3; I.2.4
LLM agents that store knowledge as natural language suffer steep retrieval degradation as condition count grows, often struggle to compose learned rules reliably, and typically lack explicit mechanisms to detect stale or adversarial knowledge. We introduce PRECEPT, a unified framework for test-time adaptation with three tightly coupled components: (1) deterministic exact-match rule retrieval over structured condition keys, (2) conflict-aware memory with Bayesian source reliability and threshold-based rule invalidation, and (3) COMPASS, a Pareto-guided prompt-evolution outer loop. Exact retrieval eliminates partial-match interpretation errors on the deterministic path (0% by construction, vs 94.4% under Theorem~B.6's independence model at N=10) and supports compositional stacking through a semantic tier hierarchy; conflict-aware memory resolves static--dynamic disagreements and supports drift adaptation; COMPASS evaluates prompts through the same end-to-end execution pipeline. Results (9--10 seeds): PRECEPT achieves a +41.1pp first-try advantage over Full Reflexion (d>1.9), +33.3pp compositional generalization (d=1.55), 100% $P_1$ on 2-way logistics compositions (d=2.64), +40--55pp continuous learning gains, strong eventual robustness under adversarial static knowledge (100% logistics with adversarial SK active; partial recovery on integration), +55.0pp drift recovery (d=0.95, p=0.031), and 61% fewer steps. Core comparisons are statistically significant, often at p<0.001.
title PRECEPT: Planning Resilience via Experience, Context Engineering & Probing Trajectories A Unified Framework for Test-Time Adaptation with Compositional Rule Learning and Pareto-Guided Prompt Evolution
topic Artificial Intelligence
Information Retrieval
I.2.11; I.2.6; H.3.3; I.2.4
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09641