Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cavalcante, Rafael Oliveira, Patriota, Alexandre Galvão
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10288
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866913000428929024
author Cavalcante, Rafael Oliveira
Patriota, Alexandre Galvão
author_facet Cavalcante, Rafael Oliveira
Patriota, Alexandre Galvão
contents Let $f_θ$ be the joint density of a random sample $X$. A frequently used criterion asserts that a statistic $T(X)$ is minimal sufficient if, for any sample points $x$ and $y$, $T(x) = T(y)$ exactly when there exists a finite constant $h_{xy} > 0$, independent of $θ$, such that $f_θ(y) = f_θ(x)h_{xy}$ for all $θ$. We show that this criterion is false in general via a counterexample exploiting the non-uniqueness of versions of Radon--Nikodym derivatives. Although Sato (1996) established sufficient regularity conditions for the validity of this criterion, these conditions are frequently intractable to verify in practice. We resolve this limitation by introducing a version-robust method applicable whenever sufficiency is known. Moreover, our method allows us to generalize Sato's approach from Euclidean settings to arbitrary analytic Borel sample spaces and separable measurable statistic spaces. We also obtain a method for exponential-family densities under verifiable hypotheses. Taken together, these results clarify when pointwise likelihood-ratio arguments for minimal sufficiency are mathematically sound in irregular settings. Finally, we construct a counterexample demonstrating that a distinct criterion for minimal sufficiency due to Pfanzagl (1994, 2017) similarly fails in the absence of supplementary hypotheses. Identifying minimal sufficient statistics is important not only for parsimonious data reduction but also because, in models admitting complete sufficiency, such statistics provide a practical route to the complete sufficient structure underlying optimal estimation and prediction.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_10288
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Version-Robust Methods for Identifying Minimal Sufficient Statistics
Cavalcante, Rafael Oliveira
Patriota, Alexandre Galvão
Statistics Theory
Let $f_θ$ be the joint density of a random sample $X$. A frequently used criterion asserts that a statistic $T(X)$ is minimal sufficient if, for any sample points $x$ and $y$, $T(x) = T(y)$ exactly when there exists a finite constant $h_{xy} > 0$, independent of $θ$, such that $f_θ(y) = f_θ(x)h_{xy}$ for all $θ$. We show that this criterion is false in general via a counterexample exploiting the non-uniqueness of versions of Radon--Nikodym derivatives. Although Sato (1996) established sufficient regularity conditions for the validity of this criterion, these conditions are frequently intractable to verify in practice. We resolve this limitation by introducing a version-robust method applicable whenever sufficiency is known. Moreover, our method allows us to generalize Sato's approach from Euclidean settings to arbitrary analytic Borel sample spaces and separable measurable statistic spaces. We also obtain a method for exponential-family densities under verifiable hypotheses. Taken together, these results clarify when pointwise likelihood-ratio arguments for minimal sufficiency are mathematically sound in irregular settings. Finally, we construct a counterexample demonstrating that a distinct criterion for minimal sufficiency due to Pfanzagl (1994, 2017) similarly fails in the absence of supplementary hypotheses. Identifying minimal sufficient statistics is important not only for parsimonious data reduction but also because, in models admitting complete sufficiency, such statistics provide a practical route to the complete sufficient structure underlying optimal estimation and prediction.
title Version-Robust Methods for Identifying Minimal Sufficient Statistics
topic Statistics Theory
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10288