Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12746 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917338201194496 |
|---|---|
| author | Huang, Yuzhi Wen, Kairun Gao, Rongxin Liu, Dongxuan Lou, Yibin Wu, Jie Xu, Jing Zhang, Jian Yang, Zheng Lin, Yunlong Li, Chenxin Pan, Panwang Lu, Junbin Jiang, Jingyan Ding, Xinghao Huang, Yue Wang, Zhi |
| author_facet | Huang, Yuzhi Wen, Kairun Gao, Rongxin Liu, Dongxuan Lou, Yibin Wu, Jie Xu, Jing Zhang, Jian Yang, Zheng Lin, Yunlong Li, Chenxin Pan, Panwang Lu, Junbin Jiang, Jingyan Ding, Xinghao Huang, Yue Wang, Zhi |
| contents | Humans inhabit a physical 4D world where geometric structure and semantic content evolve over time, constituting a dynamic 4D reality (spatial with temporal dimension). While current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel in static visual understanding, can they also be adept at "thinking in dynamics", i.e., perceive, track and reason about spatio-temporal dynamics in evolving scenes? To systematically assess their spatio-temporal reasoning and localized dynamics perception capabilities, we introduce Dyn-Bench, a large-scale benchmark built from diverse real-world and synthetic video datasets, enabling robust and scalable evaluation of spatio-temporal understanding. Through multi-stage filtering from massive 2D and 4D data sources, Dyn-Bench provides a high-quality collection of dynamic scenes, comprising 1k videos, 7k visual question answering (VQA) pairs, and 3k dynamic object grounding pairs. We probe general, spatial and region-level MLLMs to express how they think in dynamics both linguistically and visually, and find that existing models cannot simultaneously maintain strong performance in both spatio-temporal reasoning and dynamic object grounding, often producing inconsistent interpretations of motion and interaction. Notably, conventional prompting strategies (e.g., chain-of-thought or caption-based hints) provide limited improvement, whereas structured integration approaches, including Mask-Guided Fusion and Spatio-Temporal Textual Cognitive Map (ST-TCM), significantly enhance MLLMs' dynamics perception and spatio-temporal reasoning in the physical 4D world. Code and benchmark are available at https://dyn-bench.github.io/. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_12746 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Thinking in Dynamics: How Multimodal Large Language Models Perceive, Track, and Reason Dynamics in Physical 4D World Huang, Yuzhi Wen, Kairun Gao, Rongxin Liu, Dongxuan Lou, Yibin Wu, Jie Xu, Jing Zhang, Jian Yang, Zheng Lin, Yunlong Li, Chenxin Pan, Panwang Lu, Junbin Jiang, Jingyan Ding, Xinghao Huang, Yue Wang, Zhi Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Humans inhabit a physical 4D world where geometric structure and semantic content evolve over time, constituting a dynamic 4D reality (spatial with temporal dimension). While current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel in static visual understanding, can they also be adept at "thinking in dynamics", i.e., perceive, track and reason about spatio-temporal dynamics in evolving scenes? To systematically assess their spatio-temporal reasoning and localized dynamics perception capabilities, we introduce Dyn-Bench, a large-scale benchmark built from diverse real-world and synthetic video datasets, enabling robust and scalable evaluation of spatio-temporal understanding. Through multi-stage filtering from massive 2D and 4D data sources, Dyn-Bench provides a high-quality collection of dynamic scenes, comprising 1k videos, 7k visual question answering (VQA) pairs, and 3k dynamic object grounding pairs. We probe general, spatial and region-level MLLMs to express how they think in dynamics both linguistically and visually, and find that existing models cannot simultaneously maintain strong performance in both spatio-temporal reasoning and dynamic object grounding, often producing inconsistent interpretations of motion and interaction. Notably, conventional prompting strategies (e.g., chain-of-thought or caption-based hints) provide limited improvement, whereas structured integration approaches, including Mask-Guided Fusion and Spatio-Temporal Textual Cognitive Map (ST-TCM), significantly enhance MLLMs' dynamics perception and spatio-temporal reasoning in the physical 4D world. Code and benchmark are available at https://dyn-bench.github.io/. |
| title | Thinking in Dynamics: How Multimodal Large Language Models Perceive, Track, and Reason Dynamics in Physical 4D World |
| topic | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12746 |