Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kietkajornrit, Auksarapak, Tarifi, Jad, Asgharbeygi, Nima
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14458
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866914395368456192
author Kietkajornrit, Auksarapak
Tarifi, Jad
Asgharbeygi, Nima
author_facet Kietkajornrit, Auksarapak
Tarifi, Jad
Asgharbeygi, Nima
contents Fact-seeking question answering with large language models (LLMs) remains unreliable when answers depend on up-to-date or conflicting information. Although retrieval-augmented and tool-using LLMs reduce hallucinations, they often rely on implicit planning, leading to inefficient tool usage. We propose a modular framework that explicitly separates planning from factual retrieval and answer synthesis. A lightweight student planner is trained via a teacher-student framework to generate structured decompositions consisting of abstract reasoning steps and searchable fact requests. The supervision signals contain only planning traces and fact requests, without providing factual answers or retrieved evidence. At inference, the planner produces plans, while prompt-engineered modules perform retrieval and response synthesis. We evaluate the proposed framework on SEAL-0, an extremely challenging benchmark for search-augmented LLMs. Results show that supervised planning improves both accuracy and latency compared to monolithic reasoning models and prompt-based tool-augmented frameworks, demonstrating that explicitly learned planning structures are essential for reliable fact-seeking LLMs.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_14458
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Distilling Reasoning Without Knowledge: A Framework for Reliable LLMs
Kietkajornrit, Auksarapak
Tarifi, Jad
Asgharbeygi, Nima
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Information Retrieval
Fact-seeking question answering with large language models (LLMs) remains unreliable when answers depend on up-to-date or conflicting information. Although retrieval-augmented and tool-using LLMs reduce hallucinations, they often rely on implicit planning, leading to inefficient tool usage. We propose a modular framework that explicitly separates planning from factual retrieval and answer synthesis. A lightweight student planner is trained via a teacher-student framework to generate structured decompositions consisting of abstract reasoning steps and searchable fact requests. The supervision signals contain only planning traces and fact requests, without providing factual answers or retrieved evidence. At inference, the planner produces plans, while prompt-engineered modules perform retrieval and response synthesis. We evaluate the proposed framework on SEAL-0, an extremely challenging benchmark for search-augmented LLMs. Results show that supervised planning improves both accuracy and latency compared to monolithic reasoning models and prompt-based tool-augmented frameworks, demonstrating that explicitly learned planning structures are essential for reliable fact-seeking LLMs.
title Distilling Reasoning Without Knowledge: A Framework for Reliable LLMs
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Information Retrieval
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14458