The Impact of Ideological Discourses in RAG: A Case Study with COVID-19 Treatments
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866915865355616256 |
|---|---|
| author | Salari, Elmira Delfino, Maria Claudia Nunes Amamou, Hazem de Souza, José Victor Kshirsagar, Shruti Davoust, Alan Avila, Anderson |
| author_facet | Salari, Elmira Delfino, Maria Claudia Nunes Amamou, Hazem de Souza, José Victor Kshirsagar, Shruti Davoust, Alan Avila, Anderson |
| contents | This paper studies the impact of retrieved ideological texts on the outputs of large language models (LLMs). While interest in understanding ideology in LLMs has recently increased, little attention has been given to this issue in the context of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). To fill this gap, we design an external knowledge source based on ideological loaded texts about COVID-19 treatments. Our corpus is based on 1,117 academic articles representing discourses about controversial and endorsed treatments for the disease. We propose a corpus linguistics framework, based on Lexical Multidimensional Analysis (LMDA), to identify the ideologies within the corpus. LLMs are tasked to answer questions derived from three identified ideological dimensions, and two types of contextual prompts are adopted: the first comprises the user question and ideological texts; and the second contains the question, ideological texts, and LMDA descriptions. Ideological alignment between reference ideological texts and LLMs' responses is assessed using cosine similarity for lexical and semantic representations. Results demonstrate that LLMs' responses based on ideological retrieved texts are more aligned with the ideology encountered in the external knowledge, with the enhanced prompt further influencing LLMs' outputs. Our findings highlight the importance of identifying ideological discourses within the RAG framework in order to mitigate not just unintended ideological bias, but also the risks of malicious manipulation of such models. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_14838 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | The Impact of Ideological Discourses in RAG: A Case Study with COVID-19 Treatments Salari, Elmira Delfino, Maria Claudia Nunes Amamou, Hazem de Souza, José Victor Kshirsagar, Shruti Davoust, Alan Avila, Anderson Computation and Language This paper studies the impact of retrieved ideological texts on the outputs of large language models (LLMs). While interest in understanding ideology in LLMs has recently increased, little attention has been given to this issue in the context of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). To fill this gap, we design an external knowledge source based on ideological loaded texts about COVID-19 treatments. Our corpus is based on 1,117 academic articles representing discourses about controversial and endorsed treatments for the disease. We propose a corpus linguistics framework, based on Lexical Multidimensional Analysis (LMDA), to identify the ideologies within the corpus. LLMs are tasked to answer questions derived from three identified ideological dimensions, and two types of contextual prompts are adopted: the first comprises the user question and ideological texts; and the second contains the question, ideological texts, and LMDA descriptions. Ideological alignment between reference ideological texts and LLMs' responses is assessed using cosine similarity for lexical and semantic representations. Results demonstrate that LLMs' responses based on ideological retrieved texts are more aligned with the ideology encountered in the external knowledge, with the enhanced prompt further influencing LLMs' outputs. Our findings highlight the importance of identifying ideological discourses within the RAG framework in order to mitigate not just unintended ideological bias, but also the risks of malicious manipulation of such models. |
| title | The Impact of Ideological Discourses in RAG: A Case Study with COVID-19 Treatments |
| topic | Computation and Language |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14838 |