What Matters for Scalable and Robust Learning in End-to-End Driving Planners?
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866912968356134912 |
|---|---|
| author | Holtz, David Hanselmann, Niklas Doll, Simon Cordts, Marius Schiele, Bernt |
| author_facet | Holtz, David Hanselmann, Niklas Doll, Simon Cordts, Marius Schiele, Bernt |
| contents | End-to-end autonomous driving has gained significant attention for its potential to learn robust behavior in interactive scenarios and scale with data. Popular architectures often build on separate modules for perception and planning connected through latent representations, such as bird's eye view feature grids, to maintain end-to-end differentiability. This paradigm emerged mostly on open-loop datasets, with evaluation focusing not only on driving performance, but also intermediate perception tasks. Unfortunately, architectural advances that excel in open-loop often fail to translate to scalable learning of robust closed-loop driving. In this paper, we systematically re-examine the impact of common architectural patterns on closed-loop performance: (1) high-resolution perceptual representations, (2) disentangled trajectory representations, and (3) generative planning. Crucially, our analysis evaluates the combined impact of these patterns, revealing both unexpected limitations as well as underexplored synergies. Building on these insights, we introduce BevAD, a novel lightweight and highly scalable end-to-end driving architecture. BevAD achieves 72.7% success rate on the Bench2Drive benchmark and demonstrates strong data-scaling behavior using pure imitation learning. Our code and models are publicly available here: https://dmholtz.github.io/bevad/ |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_15185 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | What Matters for Scalable and Robust Learning in End-to-End Driving Planners? Holtz, David Hanselmann, Niklas Doll, Simon Cordts, Marius Schiele, Bernt Robotics Artificial Intelligence Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition End-to-end autonomous driving has gained significant attention for its potential to learn robust behavior in interactive scenarios and scale with data. Popular architectures often build on separate modules for perception and planning connected through latent representations, such as bird's eye view feature grids, to maintain end-to-end differentiability. This paradigm emerged mostly on open-loop datasets, with evaluation focusing not only on driving performance, but also intermediate perception tasks. Unfortunately, architectural advances that excel in open-loop often fail to translate to scalable learning of robust closed-loop driving. In this paper, we systematically re-examine the impact of common architectural patterns on closed-loop performance: (1) high-resolution perceptual representations, (2) disentangled trajectory representations, and (3) generative planning. Crucially, our analysis evaluates the combined impact of these patterns, revealing both unexpected limitations as well as underexplored synergies. Building on these insights, we introduce BevAD, a novel lightweight and highly scalable end-to-end driving architecture. BevAD achieves 72.7% success rate on the Bench2Drive benchmark and demonstrates strong data-scaling behavior using pure imitation learning. Our code and models are publicly available here: https://dmholtz.github.io/bevad/ |
| title | What Matters for Scalable and Robust Learning in End-to-End Driving Planners? |
| topic | Robotics Artificial Intelligence Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15185 |