Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15276 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866915866966228992 |
|---|---|
| author | Sourget, Théo Claßen, Niclas Xu, Jack Junchi van der Goot, Rob Cheplygina, Veronika |
| author_facet | Sourget, Théo Claßen, Niclas Xu, Jack Junchi van der Goot, Rob Cheplygina, Veronika |
| contents | The diversity of training datasets is usually perceived as an important aspect to obtain a robust model. However, the definition of diversity is often not defined or differs across papers, and while some metrics exist, the quantification of this diversity is often overlooked when developing new algorithms. In this work, we study the behaviour of multiple dataset diversity metrics for image, text and metadata using MorphoMNIST, a toy dataset with controlled perturbations, and PadChest, a publicly available chest X-ray dataset. We evaluate whether these metrics correlate with each other but also with the intuition of a clinical expert. We also assess whether they correlate with downstream-task performance and how they impact the training dynamic of the models. We find limited correlations between the AUC and image or metadata reference-free diversity metrics, but higher correlations with the FID and the semantic diversity metrics. Finally, the clinical expert indicates that scanners are the main source of diversity in practice. However, we find that the addition of another scanner to the training set leads to shortcut learning. The code used in this study is available at https://github.com/TheoSourget/dataset_diversity_evaluation |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_15276 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Dataset Diversity Metrics and Impact on Classification Models Sourget, Théo Claßen, Niclas Xu, Jack Junchi van der Goot, Rob Cheplygina, Veronika Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition The diversity of training datasets is usually perceived as an important aspect to obtain a robust model. However, the definition of diversity is often not defined or differs across papers, and while some metrics exist, the quantification of this diversity is often overlooked when developing new algorithms. In this work, we study the behaviour of multiple dataset diversity metrics for image, text and metadata using MorphoMNIST, a toy dataset with controlled perturbations, and PadChest, a publicly available chest X-ray dataset. We evaluate whether these metrics correlate with each other but also with the intuition of a clinical expert. We also assess whether they correlate with downstream-task performance and how they impact the training dynamic of the models. We find limited correlations between the AUC and image or metadata reference-free diversity metrics, but higher correlations with the FID and the semantic diversity metrics. Finally, the clinical expert indicates that scanners are the main source of diversity in practice. However, we find that the addition of another scanner to the training set leads to shortcut learning. The code used in this study is available at https://github.com/TheoSourget/dataset_diversity_evaluation |
| title | Dataset Diversity Metrics and Impact on Classification Models |
| topic | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15276 |