Casimir versus Helmholtz forces in the Gaussian model: exact results for Dirichlet--Dirichlet, Neumann--Dirichlet, Neumann--Neumann, and periodic boundary conditions
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866915882948624384 |
|---|---|
| author | Dantchev, Daniel Rudnick, Joseph |
| author_facet | Dantchev, Daniel Rudnick, Joseph |
| contents | We present results and compare the behavior of two fluctuation-induced forces pertinent for their corresponding ensembles: the critical Casimir force in the grand canonical (fixed external field $h$) one and the critical Helmholtz force in the canonical (fixed average value of the order parameter $m$) one. We do so by deriving exact results for their behavior near the bulk critical point at $T=T_c$ in the three-dimensional Gaussian model. We consider Dirichlet-Dirichlet, Neumann-Dirichlet, Neumann-Neumann, and periodic boundary conditions. For every boundary condition examined, we confirm that both forces follow a finite-size scaling. We find that for Dirichlet-Dirichlet and Neumann-Dirichlet boundary conditions the Casimir and the Helmholtz force differ from each other. For Dirichlet-Dirichlet boundary conditions the Casimir force is always attractive, while the Helmholtz force can be both attractive and repulsive as a function of $T$ and $m$. For Neumann-Dirichlet boundary conditions the Casimir force changes sign from repulsive to attractive with increase of $h$, while the Helmholtz force stays always repulsive. Under periodic and Neumann-Neumann boundary conditions the Casimir force and the Helmholtz force coincide - the first does not depend on $h$, while the latter does not depend on $m$; they are always attractive. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_16030 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Casimir versus Helmholtz forces in the Gaussian model: exact results for Dirichlet--Dirichlet, Neumann--Dirichlet, Neumann--Neumann, and periodic boundary conditions Dantchev, Daniel Rudnick, Joseph Statistical Mechanics We present results and compare the behavior of two fluctuation-induced forces pertinent for their corresponding ensembles: the critical Casimir force in the grand canonical (fixed external field $h$) one and the critical Helmholtz force in the canonical (fixed average value of the order parameter $m$) one. We do so by deriving exact results for their behavior near the bulk critical point at $T=T_c$ in the three-dimensional Gaussian model. We consider Dirichlet-Dirichlet, Neumann-Dirichlet, Neumann-Neumann, and periodic boundary conditions. For every boundary condition examined, we confirm that both forces follow a finite-size scaling. We find that for Dirichlet-Dirichlet and Neumann-Dirichlet boundary conditions the Casimir and the Helmholtz force differ from each other. For Dirichlet-Dirichlet boundary conditions the Casimir force is always attractive, while the Helmholtz force can be both attractive and repulsive as a function of $T$ and $m$. For Neumann-Dirichlet boundary conditions the Casimir force changes sign from repulsive to attractive with increase of $h$, while the Helmholtz force stays always repulsive. Under periodic and Neumann-Neumann boundary conditions the Casimir force and the Helmholtz force coincide - the first does not depend on $h$, while the latter does not depend on $m$; they are always attractive. |
| title | Casimir versus Helmholtz forces in the Gaussian model: exact results for Dirichlet--Dirichlet, Neumann--Dirichlet, Neumann--Neumann, and periodic boundary conditions |
| topic | Statistical Mechanics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16030 |