Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16445 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917349943148544 |
|---|---|
| author | Yang, Xinyi Xu, Chenheng Hong, Weijun Mo, Ce Wang, Qian Fang, Fang Zhu, Yixin |
| author_facet | Yang, Xinyi Xu, Chenheng Hong, Weijun Mo, Ce Wang, Qian Fang, Fang Zhu, Yixin |
| contents | Moral reasoning is fundamental to safe Artificial Intelligence (AI), yet ensuring its consistency across modalities becomes critical as AI systems evolve from text-based assistants to embodied agents. Current safety techniques demonstrate success in textual contexts, but concerns remain about generalization to visual inputs. Existing moral evaluation benchmarks rely on textonly formats and lack systematic control over variables that influence moral decision-making. Here we show that visual inputs fundamentally alter moral decision-making in state-of-the-art (SOTA) Vision-Language Models (VLMs), bypassing text-based safety mechanisms. We introduce Moral Dilemma Simulation (MDS), a multimodal benchmark grounded in Moral Foundation Theory (MFT) that enables mechanistic analysis through orthogonal manipulation of visual and contextual variables. The evaluation reveals that the vision modality activates intuition-like pathways that override the more deliberate and safer reasoning patterns observed in text-only contexts. These findings expose critical fragilities where language-tuned safety filters fail to constrain visual processing, demonstrating the urgent need for multimodal safety alignment. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_16445 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Visual Distraction Undermines Moral Reasoning in Vision-Language Models Yang, Xinyi Xu, Chenheng Hong, Weijun Mo, Ce Wang, Qian Fang, Fang Zhu, Yixin Artificial Intelligence Moral reasoning is fundamental to safe Artificial Intelligence (AI), yet ensuring its consistency across modalities becomes critical as AI systems evolve from text-based assistants to embodied agents. Current safety techniques demonstrate success in textual contexts, but concerns remain about generalization to visual inputs. Existing moral evaluation benchmarks rely on textonly formats and lack systematic control over variables that influence moral decision-making. Here we show that visual inputs fundamentally alter moral decision-making in state-of-the-art (SOTA) Vision-Language Models (VLMs), bypassing text-based safety mechanisms. We introduce Moral Dilemma Simulation (MDS), a multimodal benchmark grounded in Moral Foundation Theory (MFT) that enables mechanistic analysis through orthogonal manipulation of visual and contextual variables. The evaluation reveals that the vision modality activates intuition-like pathways that override the more deliberate and safer reasoning patterns observed in text-only contexts. These findings expose critical fragilities where language-tuned safety filters fail to constrain visual processing, demonstrating the urgent need for multimodal safety alignment. |
| title | Visual Distraction Undermines Moral Reasoning in Vision-Language Models |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16445 |