MedCL-Bench: Benchmarking stability-efficiency trade-offs and scaling in biomedical continual learning
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866908894355259392 |
|---|---|
| author | Zeng, Min Zhou, Shuang Zhan, Zaifu Zhang, Rui |
| author_facet | Zeng, Min Zhou, Shuang Zhan, Zaifu Zhang, Rui |
| contents | Medical language models must be updated as evidence and terminology evolve, yet sequential updating can trigger catastrophic forgetting. Although biomedical NLP has many static benchmarks, no unified, task-diverse benchmark exists for evaluating continual learning under standardized protocols, robustness to task order and compute-aware reporting. We introduce MedCL-Bench, which streams ten biomedical NLP datasets spanning five task families and evaluates eleven continual learning strategies across eight task orders, reporting retention, transfer, and GPU-hour cost. Across backbones and task orders, direct sequential fine-tuning on incoming tasks induces catastrophic forgetting, causing update-induced performance regressions on prior tasks. Continual learning methods occupy distinct retention-compute frontiers: parameter-isolation provides the best retention per GPU-hour, replay offers strong protection at higher cost, and regularization yields limited benefit. Forgetting is task-dependent, with multi-label topic classification most vulnerable and constrained-output tasks more robust. MedCL-Bench provides a reproducible framework for auditing model updates before deployment. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_16738 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | MedCL-Bench: Benchmarking stability-efficiency trade-offs and scaling in biomedical continual learning Zeng, Min Zhou, Shuang Zhan, Zaifu Zhang, Rui Artificial Intelligence Medical language models must be updated as evidence and terminology evolve, yet sequential updating can trigger catastrophic forgetting. Although biomedical NLP has many static benchmarks, no unified, task-diverse benchmark exists for evaluating continual learning under standardized protocols, robustness to task order and compute-aware reporting. We introduce MedCL-Bench, which streams ten biomedical NLP datasets spanning five task families and evaluates eleven continual learning strategies across eight task orders, reporting retention, transfer, and GPU-hour cost. Across backbones and task orders, direct sequential fine-tuning on incoming tasks induces catastrophic forgetting, causing update-induced performance regressions on prior tasks. Continual learning methods occupy distinct retention-compute frontiers: parameter-isolation provides the best retention per GPU-hour, replay offers strong protection at higher cost, and regularization yields limited benefit. Forgetting is task-dependent, with multi-label topic classification most vulnerable and constrained-output tasks more robust. MedCL-Bench provides a reproducible framework for auditing model updates before deployment. |
| title | MedCL-Bench: Benchmarking stability-efficiency trade-offs and scaling in biomedical continual learning |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16738 |