Detecting the Machine: A Comprehensive Benchmark of AI-Generated Text Detectors Across Architectures, Domains, and Adversarial Conditions
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866911525487247360 |
|---|---|
| author | Baidya, Madhav S. Baidya, S. S. Chawla, Chirag |
| author_facet | Baidya, Madhav S. Baidya, S. S. Chawla, Chirag |
| contents | The rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) has created an urgent need for robust and generalizable detectors of machine-generated text. Existing benchmarks typically evaluate a single detector on a single dataset under ideal conditions, leaving open questions about cross-domain transfer, cross-LLM generalization, and adversarial robustness.
We present a comprehensive benchmark evaluating diverse detection approaches across two corpora: HC3 (23,363 human-ChatGPT pairs) and ELI5 (15,000 human-Mistral-7B pairs). Methods include classical classifiers, fine-tuned transformer encoders (BERT, RoBERTa, ELECTRA, DistilBERT, DeBERTa-v3), a CNN, an XGBoost stylometric model, perplexity-based detectors, and LLM-as-detector prompting.
Results show that transformer models achieve near-perfect in-distribution performance but degrade under domain shift. The XGBoost stylometric model matches performance while remaining interpretable. LLM-based detectors underperform and are affected by generator-detector identity bias. Perplexity-based methods exhibit polarity inversion, with modern LLM outputs showing lower perplexity than human text, but remain effective when corrected. No method generalizes robustly across domains and LLM sources. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_17522 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Detecting the Machine: A Comprehensive Benchmark of AI-Generated Text Detectors Across Architectures, Domains, and Adversarial Conditions Baidya, Madhav S. Baidya, S. S. Chawla, Chirag Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence The rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) has created an urgent need for robust and generalizable detectors of machine-generated text. Existing benchmarks typically evaluate a single detector on a single dataset under ideal conditions, leaving open questions about cross-domain transfer, cross-LLM generalization, and adversarial robustness. We present a comprehensive benchmark evaluating diverse detection approaches across two corpora: HC3 (23,363 human-ChatGPT pairs) and ELI5 (15,000 human-Mistral-7B pairs). Methods include classical classifiers, fine-tuned transformer encoders (BERT, RoBERTa, ELECTRA, DistilBERT, DeBERTa-v3), a CNN, an XGBoost stylometric model, perplexity-based detectors, and LLM-as-detector prompting. Results show that transformer models achieve near-perfect in-distribution performance but degrade under domain shift. The XGBoost stylometric model matches performance while remaining interpretable. LLM-based detectors underperform and are affected by generator-detector identity bias. Perplexity-based methods exhibit polarity inversion, with modern LLM outputs showing lower perplexity than human text, but remain effective when corrected. No method generalizes robustly across domains and LLM sources. |
| title | Detecting the Machine: A Comprehensive Benchmark of AI-Generated Text Detectors Across Architectures, Domains, and Adversarial Conditions |
| topic | Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17522 |