Mitigating LLM Hallucinations through Domain-Grounded Tiered Retrieval

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haque, Md. Asraful, Mehdi, Aasar, Mahboob, Maaz, Fatima, Tamkeen
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866914420876115968
author Haque, Md. Asraful
Mehdi, Aasar
Mahboob, Maaz
Fatima, Tamkeen
author_facet Haque, Md. Asraful
Mehdi, Aasar
Mahboob, Maaz
Fatima, Tamkeen
contents Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved unprecedented fluency but remain susceptible to "hallucinations" - the generation of factually incorrect or ungrounded content. This limitation is particularly critical in high-stakes domains where reliability is paramount. We propose a domain-grounded tiered retrieval and verification architecture designed to systematically intercept factual inaccuracies by shifting LLMs from stochastic pattern-matchers to verified truth-seekers. The proposed framework utilizes a four-phase, self-regulating pipeline implemented via LangGraph: (I) Intrinsic Verification with Early-Exit logic to optimize compute, (II) Adaptive Search Routing utilizing a Domain Detector to target subject-specific archives, (III) Refined Context Filtering (RCF) to eliminate non-essential or distracting information, and (IV) Extrinsic Regeneration followed by atomic claim-level verification. The system was evaluated across 650 queries from five diverse benchmarks: TimeQA v2, FreshQA v2, HaluEval General, MMLU Global Facts, and TruthfulQA. Empirical results demonstrate that the pipeline consistently outperforms zero-shot baselines across all environments. Win rates peaked at 83.7% in TimeQA v2 and 78.0% in MMLU Global Facts, confirming high efficacy in domains requiring granular temporal and numerical precision. Groundedness scores remained robustly stable between 78.8% and 86.4% across factual-answer rows. While the architecture provides a robust fail-safe for misinformation, a persistent failure mode of "False-Premise Overclaiming" was identified. These findings provide a detailed empirical characterization of multi-stage RAG behavior and suggest that future work should prioritize pre-retrieval "answerability" nodes to further bridge the reliability gap in conversational AI.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_17872
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Mitigating LLM Hallucinations through Domain-Grounded Tiered Retrieval
Haque, Md. Asraful
Mehdi, Aasar
Mahboob, Maaz
Fatima, Tamkeen
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
68T27, 68T30, 68T50
I.2.3; I.2.4; I.2.7
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved unprecedented fluency but remain susceptible to "hallucinations" - the generation of factually incorrect or ungrounded content. This limitation is particularly critical in high-stakes domains where reliability is paramount. We propose a domain-grounded tiered retrieval and verification architecture designed to systematically intercept factual inaccuracies by shifting LLMs from stochastic pattern-matchers to verified truth-seekers. The proposed framework utilizes a four-phase, self-regulating pipeline implemented via LangGraph: (I) Intrinsic Verification with Early-Exit logic to optimize compute, (II) Adaptive Search Routing utilizing a Domain Detector to target subject-specific archives, (III) Refined Context Filtering (RCF) to eliminate non-essential or distracting information, and (IV) Extrinsic Regeneration followed by atomic claim-level verification. The system was evaluated across 650 queries from five diverse benchmarks: TimeQA v2, FreshQA v2, HaluEval General, MMLU Global Facts, and TruthfulQA. Empirical results demonstrate that the pipeline consistently outperforms zero-shot baselines across all environments. Win rates peaked at 83.7% in TimeQA v2 and 78.0% in MMLU Global Facts, confirming high efficacy in domains requiring granular temporal and numerical precision. Groundedness scores remained robustly stable between 78.8% and 86.4% across factual-answer rows. While the architecture provides a robust fail-safe for misinformation, a persistent failure mode of "False-Premise Overclaiming" was identified. These findings provide a detailed empirical characterization of multi-stage RAG behavior and suggest that future work should prioritize pre-retrieval "answerability" nodes to further bridge the reliability gap in conversational AI.
title Mitigating LLM Hallucinations through Domain-Grounded Tiered Retrieval
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
68T27, 68T30, 68T50
I.2.3; I.2.4; I.2.7
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17872