Retrieval-Augmented LLMs for Security Incident Analysis
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909012392411136 |
|---|---|
| author | Cadet, Xavier Singh, Aditya Vikram Mamania, Harsh Koh, Edward Fitts, Alex Van Bruggen, Dirk Boboila, Simona Chin, Peter Oprea, Alina |
| author_facet | Cadet, Xavier Singh, Aditya Vikram Mamania, Harsh Koh, Edward Fitts, Alex Van Bruggen, Dirk Boboila, Simona Chin, Peter Oprea, Alina |
| contents | Investigating cybersecurity incidents requires collecting and analyzing evidence from multiple log sources, including intrusion detection alerts, network traffic records, and authentication events. This process is labor-intensive: analysts must sift through large volumes of data to identify relevant indicators and piece together what happened. We present a RAG-based system that performs security incident analysis through targeted query-based filtering and LLM semantic reasoning. The system uses a query library with associated MITRE ATT&CK techniques to extract indicators from raw logs, then retrieves relevant context to answer forensic questions and reconstruct attack sequences. We evaluate the system with eight LLM configurations on malware traffic incidents and a multi-stage Active Directory attack. We find that LLMs have different performance and tradeoffs, with Claude Sonnet 4 achieving 94% and DeepSeek V3 achieving 89% average recall across 17 malware scenarios, while DeepSeek costs 15$\times$ less than Claude per analysis, and locally-deployed Llama 3.1:70b achieves 81% recall at zero per-query cost. Attack step detection on the Active Directory scenario reaches 100% precision and up to 96% recall with an enumeration prompt. These results demonstrate that combining targeted query-based filtering with RAG-based retrieval -- confirmed essential by ablation studies -- enables accurate, cost-effective security analysis within LLM context limits. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_18196 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Retrieval-Augmented LLMs for Security Incident Analysis Cadet, Xavier Singh, Aditya Vikram Mamania, Harsh Koh, Edward Fitts, Alex Van Bruggen, Dirk Boboila, Simona Chin, Peter Oprea, Alina Cryptography and Security Artificial Intelligence Investigating cybersecurity incidents requires collecting and analyzing evidence from multiple log sources, including intrusion detection alerts, network traffic records, and authentication events. This process is labor-intensive: analysts must sift through large volumes of data to identify relevant indicators and piece together what happened. We present a RAG-based system that performs security incident analysis through targeted query-based filtering and LLM semantic reasoning. The system uses a query library with associated MITRE ATT&CK techniques to extract indicators from raw logs, then retrieves relevant context to answer forensic questions and reconstruct attack sequences. We evaluate the system with eight LLM configurations on malware traffic incidents and a multi-stage Active Directory attack. We find that LLMs have different performance and tradeoffs, with Claude Sonnet 4 achieving 94% and DeepSeek V3 achieving 89% average recall across 17 malware scenarios, while DeepSeek costs 15$\times$ less than Claude per analysis, and locally-deployed Llama 3.1:70b achieves 81% recall at zero per-query cost. Attack step detection on the Active Directory scenario reaches 100% precision and up to 96% recall with an enumeration prompt. These results demonstrate that combining targeted query-based filtering with RAG-based retrieval -- confirmed essential by ablation studies -- enables accurate, cost-effective security analysis within LLM context limits. |
| title | Retrieval-Augmented LLMs for Security Incident Analysis |
| topic | Cryptography and Security Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18196 |