Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Do, Patrick Phuoc, Tang, Kaiyuan, Ai, Kuangshi, Wang, Chaoli
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19000
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866908902609649664
author Do, Patrick Phuoc
Tang, Kaiyuan
Ai, Kuangshi
Wang, Chaoli
author_facet Do, Patrick Phuoc
Tang, Kaiyuan
Ai, Kuangshi
Wang, Chaoli
contents Scientific visualization (SciVis) has become an essential means for exploring, understanding, and communicating complex scientific phenomena. However, the field still lacks a validated instrument assessing how well people read, understand, and interpret them. We present a scientific visualization literacy assessment test (SVLAT) that measures the general public's SciVis literacy. Covering a range of visualization forms and interpretation demands, SVLAT comprises 49 items grounded in 18 scientific visualizations and illustrations spanning eight visualization techniques and 11 tasks. Instrument development followed a staged, psychometrically grounded pipeline. We defined the construct and blueprint, followed by item generation, and expert review with five SciVis experts using the content validity ratio (mean CVR = 0.79). We subsequently administered a pilot test (30 participants) and a large-scale test tryout (485 participants) to evaluate the instrument's psychometric properties. For validation, we performed item analysis and refinement using both classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) to examine item functioning and overall test quality. SVLAT demonstrates high reliability in the tryout sample (McDonald's omega_t = 0.82, Cronbach's alpha = 0.81). The assessment materials are available at https://osf.io/hr3nw/.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_19000
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle SVLAT: Scientific Visualization Literacy Assessment Test
Do, Patrick Phuoc
Tang, Kaiyuan
Ai, Kuangshi
Wang, Chaoli
Human-Computer Interaction
Scientific visualization (SciVis) has become an essential means for exploring, understanding, and communicating complex scientific phenomena. However, the field still lacks a validated instrument assessing how well people read, understand, and interpret them. We present a scientific visualization literacy assessment test (SVLAT) that measures the general public's SciVis literacy. Covering a range of visualization forms and interpretation demands, SVLAT comprises 49 items grounded in 18 scientific visualizations and illustrations spanning eight visualization techniques and 11 tasks. Instrument development followed a staged, psychometrically grounded pipeline. We defined the construct and blueprint, followed by item generation, and expert review with five SciVis experts using the content validity ratio (mean CVR = 0.79). We subsequently administered a pilot test (30 participants) and a large-scale test tryout (485 participants) to evaluate the instrument's psychometric properties. For validation, we performed item analysis and refinement using both classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) to examine item functioning and overall test quality. SVLAT demonstrates high reliability in the tryout sample (McDonald's omega_t = 0.82, Cronbach's alpha = 0.81). The assessment materials are available at https://osf.io/hr3nw/.
title SVLAT: Scientific Visualization Literacy Assessment Test
topic Human-Computer Interaction
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19000